- 11 Dec, 2018 1 commit
-
-
Antonio Nino Diaz authored
Rename files prefixed by sp_ to spm_. Change-Id: Ie3016a4c4ac5987fe6fdd734c6b470c60954e23d Signed-off-by: Antonio Nino Diaz <antonio.ninodiaz@arm.com>
-
- 10 Dec, 2018 1 commit
-
-
Antonio Nino Diaz authored
The current SPM is a prototype that only supports one secure partition in EL0. The objective of SPM is to have multiple partitions. The current MM interface isn't adequate for this, so it is needed to modify heavily the code to add proper support for it. However, there are platforms which are already using this (like SGI) and removing the code would break it. For this reason, the current SPM code has been duplicated in order to temporarily preserve compatibility. All new improvements/changes to SPM will be done in the non-deprecated copy, that may change without notice. The new build option SPM_DEPRECATED has been introduced to select the SPM implementation. It defaults to 1, that selects the deprecated SPM. Change-Id: Ic9f80b53b450e97b4d3f47e4ef4a138ee8d87443 Signed-off-by: Antonio Nino Diaz <antonio.ninodiaz@arm.com>
-
- 15 Jul, 2018 1 commit
-
-
Antonio Nino Diaz authored
Instead of having a different initialization routine than the rest of the codebase, use the common implementation. Change-Id: I27c03b9905f3cf0af8810aad9e43092005387a1a Signed-off-by: Antonio Nino Diaz <antonio.ninodiaz@arm.com>
-
- 13 Jun, 2018 2 commits
-
-
Antonio Nino Diaz authored
The function xlat_arch_is_granule_size_supported() can be used to check if a specific granule size is supported. In Armv8, AArch32 only supports 4 KiB pages. AArch64 supports 4 KiB, 16 KiB or 64 KiB depending on the implementation, which is detected at runtime. The function xlat_arch_get_max_supported_granule_size() returns the max granule size supported by the implementation. Even though right now they are only used by SPM, they may be useful in other places in the future. This patch moves the code currently in SPM to the xlat tables lib so that it can be reused. Change-Id: If54624a5ecf20b9b9b7f38861b56383a03bbc8a4 Signed-off-by: Antonio Nino Diaz <antonio.ninodiaz@arm.com>
-
Antonio Nino Diaz authored
In the context management library, cm_setup_context() takes the information in ep_info to fill the registers x0-x7. This patch replaces the current code that sets them manually by the correct initialization code. Change-Id: Id1fdf4681b154026c2e3af1f9b05b19582b7d16d Signed-off-by: Antonio Nino Diaz <antonio.ninodiaz@arm.com>
-
- 23 May, 2018 2 commits
-
-
Antonio Nino Diaz authored
The current internal names are too long, which makes it hard to write code as many lines overflow the limit and need to be split, which may not help the reader. Change-Id: I072bdc8f3dd125255063ffa7f02500e5228fc9a1 Signed-off-by: Antonio Nino Diaz <antonio.ninodiaz@arm.com>
-
Antonio Nino Diaz authored
Move all information related to a Secure Partition to the struct secure_partition_context_t. This requires an in-depth refactor because most of the previous code of SPM relied on global information. Change-Id: I0a23e93817dcc191ce1d7506b8bc671d376123c4 Signed-off-by: Antonio Nino Diaz <antonio.ninodiaz@arm.com>
-
- 15 May, 2018 1 commit
-
-
Sandrine Bailleux authored
This allows secure partitions to access these registers. This is needed in some cases. For example, it has been reported that in order to implement secure storage services, a secure partition needs to encrypt/decrypt some authentication variables, which requires FP/SIMD support. Note that SPM will not do any saving/restoring of these registers on behalf of the SP. This falls under the SP's responsibility. Also note that if the SP gets preempted, it might not get a chance to save/restore FP/SIMD registers first. This patch does not address this problem. It only serves as a temporary solution to unblock development on the secure partition side. Change-Id: I3b8ccdebdac0219f6ac96ad66ab2be0be8374ad3 Signed-off-by: Sandrine Bailleux <sandrine.bailleux@arm.com>
-
- 21 Feb, 2018 1 commit
-
-
Antonio Nino Diaz authored
After executing a TLBI a DSB is needed to ensure completion of the TLBI. rk3328: The MMU is allowed to load TLB entries for as long as it is enabled. Because of this, the correct place to execute a TLBI is right after disabling the MMU. Change-Id: I8280f248d10b49a8c354a4ccbdc8f8345ac4c170 Signed-off-by: Antonio Nino Diaz <antonio.ninodiaz@arm.com>
-
- 06 Dec, 2017 2 commits
-
-
Antonio Nino Diaz authored
A new platform define, `PLAT_SP_IMAGE_XLAT_SECTION_NAME`, has been introduced to select the section where the translation tables used by the S-EL1/S-EL0 are placed. This define has been used to move the translation tables to DRAM secured by TrustZone. Most of the extra needed space in BL31 when SPM is enabled is due to the large size of the translation tables. By moving them to this memory region we can save 44 KiB. A new argument has been added to REGISTER_XLAT_CONTEXT2() to specify the region where the translation tables have to be placed by the linker. Change-Id: Ia81709b4227cb8c92601f0caf258f624c0467719 Signed-off-by: Antonio Nino Diaz <antonio.ninodiaz@arm.com>
-
Antonio Nino Diaz authored
Common code mustn't include ARM platforms headers. Change-Id: Ib6e4f5a77c2d095e6e8c3ad89c89cb1959cd3043 Signed-off-by: Antonio Nino Diaz <antonio.ninodiaz@arm.com>
-
- 15 Nov, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Antonio Nino Diaz authored
The code was incorrectly reading from ID_AA64PRF0_EL1 instead of ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1 causing the supported granularity sizes returned by the code to be wrong. This wasn't causing any problem because it's just used to check the alignment of the base of the buffer shared between Non-secure and Secure worlds, and it was aligned to more than 64 KiB, which is the maximum granularity supported by the architecture. Change-Id: Icc0d949d9521cc0ef13afb753825c475ea62d462 Signed-off-by: Antonio Nino Diaz <antonio.ninodiaz@arm.com>
-
- 10 Nov, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Antonio Nino Diaz authored
The MP info struct is placed right after the boot info struct. However, when calculating the address of the MP info, the size of the boot info struct was being multiplied by the size of the MP boot info. This left a big gap of empty space between the structs. This didn't break any code because the boot info struct has a pointer to the MP info struct. It was just wasting space. Change-Id: I1668e3540d9173261968f6740623549000bd48db Signed-off-by: Antonio Nino Diaz <antonio.ninodiaz@arm.com>
-
- 08 Nov, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Antonio Nino Diaz authored
A Secure Partition is a software execution environment instantiated in S-EL0 that can be used to implement simple management and security services. Since S-EL0 is an unprivileged exception level, a Secure Partition relies on privileged firmware e.g. ARM Trusted Firmware to be granted access to system and processor resources. Essentially, it is a software sandbox that runs under the control of privileged software in the Secure World and accesses the following system resources: - Memory and device regions in the system address map. - PE system registers. - A range of asynchronous exceptions e.g. interrupts. - A range of synchronous exceptions e.g. SMC function identifiers. A Secure Partition enables privileged firmware to implement only the absolutely essential secure services in EL3 and instantiate the rest in a partition. Since the partition executes in S-EL0, its implementation cannot be overly complex. The component in ARM Trusted Firmware responsible for managing a Secure Partition is called the Secure Partition Manager (SPM). The SPM is responsible for the following: - Validating and allocating resources requested by a Secure Partition. - Implementing a well defined interface that is used for initialising a Secure Partition. - Implementing a well defined interface that is used by the normal world and other secure services for accessing the services exported by a Secure Partition. - Implementing a well defined interface that is used by a Secure Partition to fulfil service requests. - Instantiating the software execution environment required by a Secure Partition to fulfil a service request. Change-Id: I6f7862d6bba8732db5b73f54e789d717a35e802f Co-authored-by: Douglas Raillard <douglas.raillard@arm.com> Co-authored-by: Sandrine Bailleux <sandrine.bailleux@arm.com> Co-authored-by: Achin Gupta <achin.gupta@arm.com> Co-authored-by: Antonio Nino Diaz <antonio.ninodiaz@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Antonio Nino Diaz <antonio.ninodiaz@arm.com>
-