- 07 Apr, 2021 1 commit
-
-
J. R. Okajima authored
Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
-
- 10 Feb, 2021 1 commit
-
-
J. R. Okajima authored
Aufs has an internal debugging feature which uses LOCKDEP. Without LOCKDEP, aufs cannot get the correct lock status. As a result, BUG_ON() was called unexpectedly. In other words, with the configuration of CONFIG_AUFS_DEBUG enabled and CONFIG_LOCKDEP disabled, a bug appears. Reported-by: "Zhengyuan Liu" <liuzhengyuan@g.ycsipg.com> See-also: https://www.mail-archive.com/aufs-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg05829.html Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
-
- 22 Dec, 2020 1 commit
-
-
J. R. Okajima authored
Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
-
- 20 Dec, 2020 1 commit
-
-
J. R. Okajima authored
Simply follows the mainline, 294f69e662d15 2019-10-11 compiler_attributes.h: Add 'fallthrough' pseudo keyword for switch/case use Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
-
- 18 Jun, 2020 2 commits
-
-
J. R. Okajima authored
By the recent commit 21913077f9918 2020-06-17 aufs: do not call i_readcount_inc() a very old bug was fixed, which is inblance counter. But still aufs needs to call i_readcount_inc() when the branch permission is chaned from RW to RO. Otherwise the counter reaches 0 and BUG() in i_readcount_dec() will be activated. Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit f10aea57d39d6cd311312e9e7746804f7059b5c8)
-
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira authored
The 'struct inode.i_readcount' field is maintained at the VFS, and should not be modified by filesystems. But aufs does in one place, which causes it to be unbalanced. This started with Linux v2.6.39 commit 890275b5eb79 ("IMA: maintain i_readcount in the VFS layer"), which moved the i_readcount updates from IMA into the VFS (at the same places IMA was called previously) and introduced 'mutex_lock(i_mutex)' in the ima_file_check() path. The former change is functionally equivalent, thus no changes are needed in response to it. The latter change, on the other hand, is _not_; and is reported to cause a deadlock in aufs (see below), thus it dropped the call to ima_file_check(). However, when dropping the ima_file_check() call, aufs introduced the i_readcount_inc() call as well, which according to the commit changes is not necessary. This can be observed in aufs2-standalone.git commit 1dbd1c864e455 ("aufs2.1 standalone version for linux-2.6."), announced to the aufs-users mailing list on 2011-04-04 [1]. diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog ... +commit 17eac367b03334e57a93e8051eb712add24d2534 +Author: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05@yahoo.co.jp> +Date: Fri Apr 1 16:31:22 2011 +0900 + + aufs: for 2.6.39, limit the support for IMA + + Since it acquires i_mutex and causes a deadlock, replace a + ima_file_check() call by i_readcount_inc(). + + Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05@yahoo.co.jp> ... diff --git a/fs/aufs/vfsub.c b/fs/aufs/vfsub.c ... struct file *vfsub_dentry_open(struct path *path, int flags) ... + if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(file) + && (file->f_mode & (FMODE_READ | FMODE_WRITE)) == FMODE_READ) + i_readcount_inc(path->dentry->d_inode); - err = ima_file_check(file, au_conv_oflags(flags)); ... Apparently, this might have been a misunderstanding of one hunk in the 2.6.39 commit, that deletes the lines to increment i_readcount, and adds the lines to acquire i_mutex. It reuses code from the removed function ima_counts_get() to create ima_rdwr_violation_check(), and another hunk calls the new function from ima_file_check(). But note that the i_readcount increment was _not_ called from ima_file_check() previously, via ima_counts_get(): -void ima_counts_get(struct file *file) +static void ima_rdwr_violation_check(struct file *file) { ... + mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex); /* file metadata: permissions, xattr */ ... - atomic_inc(&inode->i_readcount); @@ -318,6 +308,7 @@ int ima_file_check(struct file *file, int mask) ... + ima_rdwr_violation_check(file); So, in order to avoid the unbalance caused to i_readcount, drop the i_readcount_inc() call. Note the issue is not the lack of a corresponding i_readcount_dec() call; it's the mere usage of these functions outside of VFS layer, where i_readcount is maintained. Links: [1] https://sourceforge.net/p/aufs/mailman/message/27304125/ snippet: """ aufs2 Monday GIT release From: <sfjro@us...> - 2011-04-04 04:59:18 o news - begin supporting linux-2.6.39-rcN. ... - aufs2-2.6.git#aufs2.1 branch ... aufs: for 2.6.39, limit the support for IMA ... """ Signed-off-by: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira <mfo@canonical.com> (cherry picked from commit 515a586eeef31e0717d5dea21e2c11a965340b3c)
-
- 13 May, 2020 1 commit
-
-
J. R. Okajima authored
SELinux's d_instantiate hook calls __vfs_getxattr() BEFORE d_inode is set. Aufs should not rely upon d_inode and should use the parameter inode instead. Reported-by: "jon bird" <news@onasticksoftware.co.uk> Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit 5777718fd657e1cfdf006cd16b524c65cf2fe09b)
-
- 20 Apr, 2020 1 commit
-
-
J. R. Okajima authored
In linux v5.7-rc2, zero-length array declarations are replaced by FAM (flexible-array member), a2008395fe2e 2020-04-18 dirent.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member Aufs simply follows this trend. Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit 747a01ec1835988fa20177789a6fb65c5198fcb9)
-
- 29 Feb, 2020 1 commit
-
-
J. R. Okajima authored
In aufs5.4, kmemleak reported several false positives in fs/aufs/xino.c. I don't know why, but it may be related to the "delayed" kfree (by RCU). So I simply replace it by direct kfree() call. Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit 03836b8128073f92b4e4a1cb54f91d0d7c290d1f)
-
- 22 Jan, 2020 1 commit
-
-
J. R. Okajima authored
Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit 56b4b776c84f364384971c4cdfd66b4a2f0696d4)
-
- 16 Jan, 2020 1 commit
-
-
J. R. Okajima authored
Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit 0f5f91bda77d0690c23732fd2592ae97c908a704)
-
- 15 Dec, 2019 1 commit
-
-
J. R. Okajima authored
These "+1" were left accidentally when refining the lookup routine. Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit 4177c438179671556de7312107c8aa766ea3d658)
-
- 08 Oct, 2019 1 commit
-
-
J. R. Okajima authored
When a branch filesystem doesn't cache ACL, aufs should not cache either. Until now aufs has never met such fs, but theoretically it could happen. Actually, in linux-v5.1-rc1, NFSv3 changed its behaviour by the commit ded52fbe7020 2019-02-20 nfs: fix xfstest generic/099 failed on nfsv3 The commit ded52fbe7020 doesn't "forget" the previous acl though. Doesn't it mean that the obsoleted acl is kept until NFS's attribute cache is expired? I don't know. I've asked it on LKML, but got no answer. Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit e448daa00228186b869356fdef8d98d9f95caf53)
-
- 31 Aug, 2019 2 commits
-
-
He Zhe authored
A compilation -Wimplicit-fallthrough warning was enabled by commit a035d552a93b ("Makefile: Globally enable fall-through warning") and triggers the following warning. fs/aufs/opts.h:78:11: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] This patch adds comments according GNU manual. https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Warning-Options.html#Warning-Options Signed-off-by: He Zhe <zhe.he@windriver.com> See-also: https://www.mail-archive.com/aufs-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg05685.html (cherry picked from commit e7619996b014c5d8fd2f6ad89542c545a207667f)
-
He Zhe authored
Add missing break statement for case Opt_wsum in au_opt_simple. Signed-off-by: He Zhe <zhe.he@windriver.com> See-also: https://www.mail-archive.com/aufs-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg05684.html (cherry picked from commit 9e7d29356ab57fa5db7e92e51267176e50c1497c)
-
- 03 Aug, 2019 2 commits
-
-
J. R. Okajima authored
By the commit, 387e3746d01c 2019-06-19 locks: eliminate false positive conflicts for write lease inode->i_readcount becomes common to CONFIG_IMA and CONFIG_FILE_LOCKING. In aufs branch management, eg. re-setting the branch attribute RW to RO, aufs has to maintain i_readcount too. Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
-
J. R. Okajima authored
By the commit, c71fd893f614 2019-06-17 locking/rwsem: Make owner available even if !CONFIG_RWSEM_SPIN_ON_OWNER rwsem->owner is always defined regardless CONFIG_RWSEM_SPIN_ON_OWNER. Aufs simply follows it.
-
- 07 Jun, 2019 3 commits
-
-
J. R. Okajima authored
Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit 4596850541ed7144f7fea951d02f0f6251c4a997)
-
J. R. Okajima authored
The scenario is very similar to previous commit "aufs: bugfix, ignore the being freed dynop object". One exception is that this commit is for sbinfo object which is managed by kobject (instead of kref). In order to enter the plink-maintenance mode, users write an ID to "/proc/fs/aufs/plink_maint" (this path is defined as macros in include/uapi/linux/aufs_type.h). If someone else is unmounting the aufs mount corresponding that ID, then the searcher task may find a being freed sbinfo object. The problem and the fix is very similar to previous commit "aufs: bugfix, ignore the being freed dynop object". Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit 949b498ae30797b19b9e7ac9b230815f31ffe378)
-
J. R. Okajima authored
Aufs DYNOP (Dynamically customizable FS operations) object is managed by kref, and when its counter reaches zero, the callback function removes the object from the internal list which is protected by a spinlock and then frees the object. Here there is a small time window between A: the counter reaches zero, and B: require the lock to remove the object from the list. If someone else acquires the lock and searches the list, it may find the counter-zero'ed object which means the object is being freed. This commit ignores the object whose counter is already zero. Reported-and-tested-by: Kirill Kolyshkin <kolyshkin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit b633d7b2635b9615fe294b85257d05008e3747a3)
-
- 27 May, 2019 2 commits
-
-
J. R. Okajima authored
Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit 9dbd45984201453ecebcc03a91699878aa38239d)
-
J. R. Okajima authored
At the mount-time, XINO files are created and removed very soon. When multiple mounts with being given the same XINO file path executed in parallel, some of them may fail in creating XINO due to EEXIST. Introducing a local mutex, make it serialized. By default, XINO is created at the top dir of the first writable branch. In this case, the new mutex won't be used. Obviously this is an unnecessary overhead when the XINO file path is not same, and such lock should be done by inode_lock() for the parent dir. Actually au_xino_create2() behaves in this manner. Then why didn't I apply the same way to this au_xino_create()? It is just because of my laziness. Calling VFS filp_open() here is easy for me. Reported-by: Kirill Kolyshkin <kolyshkin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit 30d9273f2a1ce331b1a79b770bdb4c493919a673)
-
- 23 May, 2019 2 commits
-
-
J. R. Okajima authored
Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
-
J. R. Okajima authored
Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
-
- 09 Apr, 2019 3 commits
-
-
J. R. Okajima authored
With a little hope to make it easier to read. Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
-
J. R. Okajima authored
In mainline, by the commit e220140ff624 2019-02-06 fsnotify: remove dirent events from FS_EVENTS_POSS_ON_CHILD mask the macro is redefined, and aufs simply follows it. Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
-
J. R. Okajima authored
In mainline, by the commit 71368af9027f 2019-01-29 x86/speculation: Add PR_SPEC_DISABLE_NOEXEC a new flag is introduced. And aufs simply follows it. Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
-
- 09 Mar, 2019 13 commits
-
-
J. R. Okajima authored
Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
-
J. R. Okajima authored
Although I am not sure module_exit is necessary for the statically linked module, here is it. I hope it does no harm. Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
-
J. R. Okajima authored
They are historical options and a branch attribute. Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
-
J. R. Okajima authored
Fuse doesn't want the callers to access the inode attributes without issuing stat, and it is not assured that they are valid after lookup or iget(). The inode attribute is critical for aufs, and aufs decided to call stat every time for fuse. Of course, it makes aufs slow. But when the branch fs is not fuse, stat is not called. Currently, only FUSE implements ->poll(), and aufs supports it. Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
-
J. R. Okajima authored
Basically ramfs is limited for its size, and is not suitable for aufs RW branch. But people sometimes use it as RW branch without knowing it or with knowing it. This configuration is for those who knows what he is doing. Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
-
J. R. Okajima authored
Special support for filesystems which acquires an inode mutex at final closing a file, eg, hfsplus. This trick is very simple and stupid, just to open the file before really necessary open to tell hfsplus that this is not the final closing. The caller should call au_h_open_pre() after acquiring the inode mutex, and au_h_open_post() after releasing it. Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
-
J. R. Okajima authored
Still I am not sure how this feature breaches the security. Some people say it doesn't matter. But I don't know. Anyway upon the request from the users, aufs implements it as a module option. Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
-
J. R. Okajima authored
It is ok that the branch is loopback-mounted. But it had a problem if the backend fs-image is placed on another branch, and aufs had prohibited such nested branch for a long time due to the recursive lookup by 'loopN' daemon. I don't remember when it was, but the daemon stopped such recursive behaviour, but aufs is still prohibitting the nested branch via loopback-mount. Upon the request from users, aufs will allow the loopback-mounted branch on another branch by another patch (aufs4-loopback.patch in aufs4-standalone.git). Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
-
J. R. Okajima authored
This feature automatically handles MVDOWN in other commits. In user-space, a daemon monitors the free space of the branch and issues MVDOWN ioctl automatically when necessary. The main role is in user-space and several options are implemented. For a branch to join the FHSM circle, a new attribute 'fhsm' should be specified. See also the document in this commit. Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
-
J. R. Okajima authored
When these attributes are specified and aufs tries opening a file on that branch, aufs copies/moves it up. Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
-
J. R. Okajima authored
Support for the options of MVDOWN feature, which allows to overwrite the existing entry, and writing to the branch even if its permission is RO. Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
-
J. R. Okajima authored
Another ioctl feature, move-down. The behaviour is, as you can guess, the opposite of copy-up. The feature called FHSM (file-based hierarchical storage management, in later commit) uses this ioctl aggressively. See also the document in this commit. Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
-
J. R. Okajima authored
Because of some inode is in use, the deletion of a branch can fail. For those who wants to test the inode is busy or not, aufs provides an ioctl, and a utility 'aubusy' in aufs-util.git. Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
-