GitLab

As a part of branch-management, aufs maintains all cached inodes,
dentries, and opened files in remounting.
This commits handles the cached inodes by counting the number of cached
inodes, generating an array of their pointers. I don't like such array
approach, but I don't have another idea.
Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>

This commit is just to prepare for the succeeding commit, and split to
suppress the size of a single commit.
Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>

As a part of looking-up, construct a virtual inode.
After branch-management (add/del branches), the inode has to be
refreshed to represent a revealed file.
Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>

In order to prevent firing the notify event from aufs itself, hnotify
feature is suspend/resume-able. They are combined with mutex lock/unlock
for the parent dir.

See also previous commits.
Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>

Imagine a sequence such like this.
- user opens a file which exists on the lower readonly branch.
- user unlinks the file (still opened). its parent dir may be removed
  too.
- user writes something to the file.

Then aufs has to copy-up the unlinked file.
Note that the copy-up in aufs is not done in open(2) by default.
This commit handles this case by copy-up the file in write(2).
The target directory is the one which aufs created internally for this
purpose.
Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>

The functions for
- create the copy-up target file
- copy filedata
- copy metadata

In copying filedata, I had tried splice_direct() instead of repeating
read/write. Surprisingly, I could not see a big difference. So let's
keep this approach for a while. Someday SEEK_DATA/SEEK_HOLE become more
popular, it may help optimizing this read/write.
Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>

In freeing aufs iinfo objects, it acquires the internal rw_sem (see
another commit in detail). Since iinfo can be freed anytime, a deadlock
may happen due to the rw_sem. To prevent this problem, this commit
introduces a flag per task.
This is another (very) ugly approach which I don't like.
Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>

XINO and XIB files are read and written frequently after unlinked, and
it means that the remote filesystems are not suitable for them.
Additionally aufs shows their metadata via debugfs (in later commit).
To make it easier to do this, aufs expects branch filesystems to
maintain their i_size and i_blocks. And it means some filesystem are not
suitable for XINO.
Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>

For details, see previous commit.
Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>

The generation of iinfo and dinfo inherit sbinfo's.
Also iinfo generation tracks the branch inode's generation to test the
matching after the branch management.
Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>

This is a very old debugging routine for rw_semaphore I was using
privately and less meaningful to other people. It was (probably) before
LOCKDEP feature was introduced, but now it is based upon LOCKDEP. This
is compiled when CONFIG_AUFS_DEBUG is enabled.
Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>

See the documents in this commit.
Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>