Resource group (FREE)
Introduced in GitLab 12.7.
By default, pipelines in GitLab CI/CD run in parallel. The parallelization is an important factor to improve the feedback loop in merge requests, however, there are some situations that you may want to limit the concurrency on deployment jobs to run them one by one. Use resource groups to strategically control the concurrency of the jobs for optimizing your continuous deployments workflow with safety.
Add a resource group
Provided that you have the following pipeline configuration (.gitlab-ci.yml
file in your repository):
build:
stage: build
script: echo "Your build script"
deploy:
stage: deploy
script: echo "Your deployment script"
environment: production
Every time you push a new commit to a branch, it runs a new pipeline that has
two jobs build
and deploy
. But if you push multiple commits in a short interval, multiple
pipelines start running simultaneously, for example:
- The first pipeline runs the jobs
build
->deploy
- The second pipeline runs the jobs
build
->deploy
In this case, the deploy
jobs across different pipelines could run concurrently
to the production
environment. Running multiple deployment scripts to the same
infrastructure could harm/confuse the instance and leave it in a corrupted state in the worst case.
In order to ensure that a deploy
job runs once at a time, you can specify
resource_group
keyword to the concurrency sensitive job:
deploy:
...
resource_group: production
With this configuration, the safety on the deployments is assured while you
can still run build
jobs concurrently for maximizing the pipeline efficiency.
Requirements
- The basic knowledge of the GitLab CI/CD pipelines
- The basic knowledge of the GitLab Environments and Deployments
- At least the Developer role for the project to configure CI/CD pipelines.
Limitations
Only one resource can be attached to a resource group.
Process modes
- Introduced in GitLab 14.3.
- Feature flag
ci_resource_group_process_modes
removed in GitLab 14.4.- Generally available in GitLab 14.4.
You can choose a process mode to strategically control the job concurrency for your deployment preferences. The following modes are supported:
-
Unordered: This is the default process mode that limits the concurrency on running jobs. It's the easiest option to use and useful when you don't care about the execution order of the jobs. It starts processing the jobs whenever a job ready to run.
-
Oldest first: This process mode limits the concurrency of the jobs. When a resource is free, it picks the first job from the list of upcoming jobs (
created
,scheduled
, orwaiting_for_resource
state) that are sorted by pipeline ID in ascending order.This mode is useful when you want to ensure that the jobs are executed from the oldest pipeline. This is less efficient compared to the
unordered
mode in terms of the pipeline efficiency, but safer for continuous deployments. -
Newest first: This process mode limits the concurrency of the jobs. When a resource is free, it picks the first job from the list of upcoming jobs (
created
,scheduled
orwaiting_for_resource
state) that are sorted by pipeline ID in descending order.This mode is useful when you want to ensure that the jobs are executed from the newest pipeline and cancel all of the old deploy jobs with the skip outdated deployment jobs feature. This is the most efficient option in terms of the pipeline efficiency, but you must ensure that each deployment job is idempotent.
Change the process mode
To change the process mode of a resource group, you need to use the API and
send a request to edit an existing resource group
by specifying the process_mode
:
unordered
oldest_first
newest_first
An example of difference between the process modes
Consider the following .gitlab-ci.yml
, where we have two jobs build
and deploy
each running in their own stage, and the deploy
job has a resource group set to
production
:
build:
stage: build
script: echo "Your build script"
deploy:
stage: deploy
script: echo "Your deployment script"
environment: production
resource_group: production
If three commits are pushed to the project in a short interval, that means that three pipelines run almost at the same time:
- The first pipeline runs the jobs
build
->deploy
. Let's call this deployment jobdeploy-1
. - The second pipeline runs the jobs
build
->deploy
. Let's call this deployment jobdeploy-2
. - The third pipeline runs the jobs
build
->deploy
. Let's call this deployment jobdeploy-3
.
Depending on the process mode of the resource group:
- If the process mode is set to
unordered
:-
deploy-1
,deploy-2
, anddeploy-3
do not run in parallel. - There is no guarantee on the job execution order, for example,
deploy-1
could run before or afterdeploy-3
runs.
-
- If the process mode is
oldest_first
:-
deploy-1
,deploy-2
, anddeploy-3
do not run in parallel. -
deploy-1
runs first,deploy-2
runs second, anddeploy-3
runs last.
-
- If the process mode is
newest_first
:-
deploy-1
,deploy-2
, anddeploy-3
do not run in parallel. -
deploy-3
runs first,deploy-2
runs second anddeploy-1
runs last.
-
Pipeline-level concurrency control with cross-project/parent-child pipelines
Introduced in GitLab 13.9.
You can define resource_group
for downstream pipelines that are sensitive to concurrent
executions. The trigger
keyword can trigger downstream pipelines and the
resource_group
keyword can co-exist with it. resource_group
is useful to control the
concurrency of deployment pipelines, while other jobs can continue to run concurrently.
The following example has two pipeline configurations in a project. When a pipeline starts running, non-sensitive jobs are executed first and aren't affected by concurrent executions in other pipelines. However, GitLab ensures that there are no other deployment pipelines running before triggering a deployment (child) pipeline. If other deployment pipelines are running, GitLab waits until those pipelines finish before running another one.
# .gitlab-ci.yml (parent pipeline)
build:
stage: build
script: echo "Building..."
test:
stage: test
script: echo "Testing..."
deploy:
stage: deploy
trigger:
include: deploy.gitlab-ci.yml
strategy: depend
resource_group: AWS-production
# deploy.gitlab-ci.yml (child pipeline)
stages:
- provision
- deploy
provision:
stage: provision
script: echo "Provisioning..."
deployment:
stage: deploy
script: echo "Deploying..."
You must define strategy: depend
with the trigger
keyword. This ensures that the lock isn't released until the downstream pipeline
finishes.
API
See the API documentation.
Related features
Read more how you can use GitLab for safe deployments.
Troubleshooting
Avoid dead locks in pipeline configurations
Since oldest_first
process mode enforces the jobs to be executed in a pipeline order,
there is a case that it doesn't work well with the other CI features.
For example, when you run a child pipeline that requires the same resource group with the parent pipeline, a dead lock could happen. Here is an example of a bad setup:
# BAD
test:
stage: test
trigger:
include: child-pipeline-requires-production-resource-group.yml
strategy: depend
deploy:
stage: deploy
script: echo
resource_group: production
In a parent pipeline, it runs the test
job that subsequently runs a child pipeline,
and the strategy: depend
option makes the test
job wait until the child pipeline has finished.
The parent pipeline runs the deploy
job in the next stage, that requires a resource from the production
resource group.
If the process mode is oldest_first
, it executes the jobs from the oldest pipelines, meaning the deploy
job is going to be executed next.
However, a child pipeline also requires a resource from the production
resource group.
Since the child pipeline is newer than the parent pipeline, the child pipeline
waits until the deploy
job is finished, something that will never happen.
In this case, you should specify the resource_group
keyword in the parent pipeline configuration instead:
# GOOD
test:
stage: test
trigger:
include: child-pipeline.yml
strategy: depend
resource_group: production # Specify the resource group in the parent pipeline
deploy:
stage: deploy
script: echo
resource_group: production