GitLab

This allows secure partitions to access these registers. This is
needed in some cases. For example, it has been reported that in order
to implement secure storage services, a secure partition needs to
encrypt/decrypt some authentication variables, which requires FP/SIMD
support.

Note that SPM will not do any saving/restoring of these registers on
behalf of the SP. This falls under the SP's responsibility.

Also note that if the SP gets preempted, it might not get a chance to
save/restore FP/SIMD registers first. This patch does not address this
problem. It only serves as a temporary solution to unblock development
on the secure partition side.

Change-Id: I3b8ccdebdac0219f6ac96ad66ab2be0be8374ad3
Signed-off-by: Sandrine Bailleux <sandrine.bailleux@arm.com>

Change-Id: I989c1f4aef8e3cb20d5d19e6347575e6449bb60b
Signed-off-by: Antonio Nino Diaz <antonio.ninodiaz@arm.com>

Void pointers have been used to access linker symbols, by declaring an
extern pointer, then taking the address of it. This limits symbols
values to aligned pointer values. To remove this restriction an
IMPORT_SYM macro has been introduced, which declares it as a char
pointer and casts it to the required type.

Change-Id: I89877fc3b13ed311817bb8ba79d4872b89bfd3b0
Signed-off-by: Joel Hutton <Joel.Hutton@Arm.com>

When the source code says 'SMCC' it is talking about the SMC Calling
Convention. The correct acronym is SMCCC. This affects a few definitions
and file names.

Some files have been renamed (smcc.h, smcc_helpers.h and smcc_macros.S)
but the old files have been kept for compatibility, they include the
new ones with an ERROR_DEPRECATED guard.

Change-Id: I78f94052a502436fdd97ca32c0fe86bd58173f2f
Signed-off-by: Antonio Nino Diaz <antonio.ninodiaz@arm.com>

After executing a TLBI a DSB is needed to ensure completion of the
TLBI.

rk3328: The MMU is allowed to load TLB entries for as long as it is
enabled. Because of this, the correct place to execute a TLBI is right
after disabling the MMU.

Change-Id: I8280f248d10b49a8c354a4ccbdc8f8345ac4c170
Signed-off-by: Antonio Nino Diaz <antonio.ninodiaz@arm.com>

Rename SP_VERSION macros to MM_VERSION, which is the name used in the MM
specification [1]. Also, a few more helper macros have been added.

MM-specific definitions have been moved to their own header file.

[1] http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.den0060a/DEN0060A_ARM_MM_Interface_Specification.pdf



Change-Id: Ia10e48c7e81a7a1f5eeca29a5270cae740a4a88a
Signed-off-by: Antonio Nino Diaz <antonio.ninodiaz@arm.com>

The Secure Partition should be able to be used from any CPU, not just
the lead one. This patch point the secure contexts of all secondary
CPUs to the same one used by the lead CPU for the Secure Partition. This
way, they can also use it.

In order to prevent more than one CPU from using the Secure Partition at
the same time, a lock has been added.

Change-Id: Ica76373127c3626498b06c558a4874ce72201ff7
Signed-off-by: Antonio Nino Diaz <antonio.ninodiaz@arm.com>

Whether a Secure Partition is being initialized or not is something
related to that specific partition, so it should be saved with the
rest of the information related to it.

Change-Id: Ie8a780f70df83fb03ef9c01ba37960208d9b5319
Signed-off-by: Antonio Nino Diaz <antonio.ninodiaz@arm.com>

This partially reverts commit d6b532b5

, keeping only the fixes to
the assertions. The changes related to the order of arguments passed
to the secure partition were not correct and violated the
specification of the SP_EVENT_COMPLETE SMC.

This patch also improves the MM_COMMUNICATE argument validation.  The
cookie argument, as it comes from normal world, can't be trusted and thus
needs to always be validated at run time rather than using an assertion.

Also validate the communication buffer address and return
INVALID_PARAMETER if it is zero, as per the MM specification.

Fix a few typos in comments and use the "secure partition" terminology
rather than "secure payload".

Change-Id: Ice6b7b5494b729dd44611f9a93d362c55ab244f7
Signed-off-by: Sandrine Bailleux <sandrine.bailleux@arm.com>

A new platform define, `PLAT_SP_IMAGE_XLAT_SECTION_NAME`, has been
introduced to select the section where the translation tables used by
the S-EL1/S-EL0 are placed.

This define has been used to move the translation tables to DRAM secured
by TrustZone.

Most of the extra needed space in BL31 when SPM is enabled is due to the
large size of the translation tables. By moving them to this memory
region we can save 44 KiB.

A new argument has been added to REGISTER_XLAT_CONTEXT2() to specify the
region where the translation tables have to be placed by the linker.

Change-Id: Ia81709b4227cb8c92601f0caf258f624c0467719
Signed-off-by: Antonio Nino Diaz <antonio.ninodiaz@arm.com>

Common code mustn't include ARM platforms headers.

Change-Id: Ib6e4f5a77c2d095e6e8c3ad89c89cb1959cd3043
Signed-off-by: Antonio Nino Diaz <antonio.ninodiaz@arm.com>

Rename SP_COMMUNICATE_AARCH32/AARCH64 into MM_COMMUNICATE_AARCH32/AARCH64
to align with the MM specification [1].

[1] http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.den0060a/DEN0060A_ARM_MM_Interface_Specification.pdf



Change-Id: I478aa4024ace7507d14a5d366aa8e20681075b03
Signed-off-by: Sandrine Bailleux <sandrine.bailleux@arm.com>

The defines have been renamed to match the names used in the
documentation.

Change-Id: I2f18b65112d2db040a89d5a8522e9790c3e21628
Signed-off-by: Antonio Nino Diaz <antonio.ninodiaz@arm.com>

The parameters passed to the Secure world from the Secure Partition
Manager when invoking SP_COMMUNICATE_AARCH32/64 were incorrect, as well
as the checks done on them.

Change-Id: I26e8c80cad0b83437db7aaada3d0d9add1c53a78
Signed-off-by: Antonio Nino Diaz <antonio.ninodiaz@arm.com>

The code was incorrectly reading from ID_AA64PRF0_EL1 instead of
ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1 causing the supported granularity sizes returned by the
code to be wrong.

This wasn't causing any problem because it's just used to check the
alignment of the base of the buffer shared between Non-secure and Secure
worlds, and it was aligned to more than 64 KiB, which is the maximum
granularity supported by the architecture.

Change-Id: Icc0d949d9521cc0ef13afb753825c475ea62d462
Signed-off-by: Antonio Nino Diaz <antonio.ninodiaz@arm.com>

The MP info struct is placed right after the boot info struct. However,
when calculating the address of the MP info, the size of the boot info
struct was being multiplied by the size of the MP boot info. This left
a big gap of empty space between the structs.

This didn't break any code because the boot info struct has a pointer to
the MP info struct. It was just wasting space.

Change-Id: I1668e3540d9173261968f6740623549000bd48db
Signed-off-by: Antonio Nino Diaz <antonio.ninodiaz@arm.com>

A Secure Partition is a software execution environment instantiated in
S-EL0 that can be used to implement simple management and security
services. Since S-EL0 is an unprivileged exception level, a Secure
Partition relies on privileged firmware e.g. ARM Trusted Firmware to be
granted access to system and processor resources. Essentially, it is a
software sandbox that runs under the control of privileged software in
the Secure World and accesses the following system resources:

- Memory and device regions in the system address map.
- PE system registers.
- A range of asynchronous exceptions e.g. interrupts.
- A range of synchronous exceptions e.g. SMC function identifiers.

A Secure Partition enables privileged firmware to implement only the
absolutely essential secure services in EL3 and instantiate the rest in
a partition. Since the partition executes in S-EL0, its implementation
cannot be overly complex.

The component in ARM Trusted Firmware responsible for managing a Secure
Partition is called the Secure Partition Manager (SPM). The SPM is
responsible for the following:

- Validating and allocating resources requested by a Secure Partition.
- Implementing a well defined interface that is used for initialising a
  Secure Partition.
- Implementing a well defined interface that is used by the normal world
  and other secure services for accessing the services exported by a
  Secure Partition.
- Implementing a well defined interface that is used by a Secure
  Partition to fulfil service requests.
- Instantiating the software execution environment required by a Secure
  Partition to fulfil a service request.

Change-Id: I6f7862d6bba8732db5b73f54e789d717a35e802f
Co-authored-by: Douglas Raillard <douglas.raillard@arm.com>
Co-authored-by: Sandrine Bailleux <sandrine.bailleux@arm.com>
Co-authored-by: Achin Gupta <achin.gupta@arm.com>
Co-authored-by: Antonio Nino Diaz <antonio.ninodiaz@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Antonio Nino Diaz <antonio.ninodiaz@arm.com>