1. 22 Jan, 2020 5 commits
  2. 16 Jan, 2020 6 commits
  3. 07 Jan, 2020 2 commits
  4. 31 Dec, 2019 3 commits
  5. 18 Dec, 2019 4 commits
  6. 17 Dec, 2019 1 commit
  7. 15 Dec, 2019 3 commits
  8. 02 Dec, 2019 4 commits
  9. 10 Oct, 2019 1 commit
  10. 09 Oct, 2019 1 commit
  11. 08 Oct, 2019 2 commits
    • J. R. Okajima's avatar
      da54e0b3
    • J. R. Okajima's avatar
      aufs: possible bugfix, uncached acl · a8614c2e
      J. R. Okajima authored
      
      
      When a branch filesystem doesn't cache ACL, aufs should not cache
      either.  Until now aufs has never met such fs, but theoretically it
      could happen.  Actually, in linux-v5.1-rc1, NFSv3 changed its behaviour
      by the commit
      	ded52fbe7020 2019-02-20 nfs: fix xfstest generic/099 failed on nfsv3
      The commit ded52fbe7020 doesn't "forget" the previous acl though.
      Doesn't it mean that the obsoleted acl is kept until NFS's attribute
      cache is expired?  I don't know.  I've asked it on LKML, but got no
      answer.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJ. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
      (cherry picked from commit e448daa00228186b869356fdef8d98d9f95caf53)
      a8614c2e
  12. 19 Sep, 2019 1 commit
  13. 31 Aug, 2019 5 commits
  14. 07 Aug, 2019 1 commit
  15. 03 Aug, 2019 1 commit
    • J. R. Okajima's avatar
      aufs: for v5.3-rc1, maintain i_readcount · 1d26f910
      J. R. Okajima authored
      
      
      By the commit,
      	387e3746d01c 2019-06-19 locks: eliminate false positive
      		conflicts for write lease
      inode->i_readcount becomes common to CONFIG_IMA and CONFIG_FILE_LOCKING.
      In aufs branch management, eg. re-setting the branch attribute RW to RO,
      aufs has to maintain i_readcount too.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJ. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
      1d26f910