- 15 Dec, 2019 1 commit
-
-
J. R. Okajima authored
These "+1" were left accidentally when refining the lookup routine. Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit 4177c438179671556de7312107c8aa766ea3d658)
-
- 08 Oct, 2019 1 commit
-
-
J. R. Okajima authored
When a branch filesystem doesn't cache ACL, aufs should not cache either. Until now aufs has never met such fs, but theoretically it could happen. Actually, in linux-v5.1-rc1, NFSv3 changed its behaviour by the commit ded52fbe7020 2019-02-20 nfs: fix xfstest generic/099 failed on nfsv3 The commit ded52fbe7020 doesn't "forget" the previous acl though. Doesn't it mean that the obsoleted acl is kept until NFS's attribute cache is expired? I don't know. I've asked it on LKML, but got no answer. Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit e448daa00228186b869356fdef8d98d9f95caf53)
-
- 31 Aug, 2019 2 commits
-
-
He Zhe authored
A compilation -Wimplicit-fallthrough warning was enabled by commit a035d552a93b ("Makefile: Globally enable fall-through warning") and triggers the following warning. fs/aufs/opts.h:78:11: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] This patch adds comments according GNU manual. https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Warning-Options.html#Warning-Options Signed-off-by: He Zhe <zhe.he@windriver.com> See-also: https://www.mail-archive.com/aufs-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg05685.html (cherry picked from commit e7619996b014c5d8fd2f6ad89542c545a207667f)
-
He Zhe authored
Add missing break statement for case Opt_wsum in au_opt_simple. Signed-off-by: He Zhe <zhe.he@windriver.com> See-also: https://www.mail-archive.com/aufs-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg05684.html (cherry picked from commit 9e7d29356ab57fa5db7e92e51267176e50c1497c)
-
- 07 Jun, 2019 3 commits
-
-
J. R. Okajima authored
Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit 4596850541ed7144f7fea951d02f0f6251c4a997)
-
J. R. Okajima authored
The scenario is very similar to previous commit "aufs: bugfix, ignore the being freed dynop object". One exception is that this commit is for sbinfo object which is managed by kobject (instead of kref). In order to enter the plink-maintenance mode, users write an ID to "/proc/fs/aufs/plink_maint" (this path is defined as macros in include/uapi/linux/aufs_type.h). If someone else is unmounting the aufs mount corresponding that ID, then the searcher task may find a being freed sbinfo object. The problem and the fix is very similar to previous commit "aufs: bugfix, ignore the being freed dynop object". Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit 949b498ae30797b19b9e7ac9b230815f31ffe378)
-
J. R. Okajima authored
Aufs DYNOP (Dynamically customizable FS operations) object is managed by kref, and when its counter reaches zero, the callback function removes the object from the internal list which is protected by a spinlock and then frees the object. Here there is a small time window between A: the counter reaches zero, and B: require the lock to remove the object from the list. If someone else acquires the lock and searches the list, it may find the counter-zero'ed object which means the object is being freed. This commit ignores the object whose counter is already zero. Reported-and-tested-by: Kirill Kolyshkin <kolyshkin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit b633d7b2635b9615fe294b85257d05008e3747a3)
-
- 27 May, 2019 2 commits
-
-
J. R. Okajima authored
Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit 9dbd45984201453ecebcc03a91699878aa38239d)
-
J. R. Okajima authored
At the mount-time, XINO files are created and removed very soon. When multiple mounts with being given the same XINO file path executed in parallel, some of them may fail in creating XINO due to EEXIST. Introducing a local mutex, make it serialized. By default, XINO is created at the top dir of the first writable branch. In this case, the new mutex won't be used. Obviously this is an unnecessary overhead when the XINO file path is not same, and such lock should be done by inode_lock() for the parent dir. Actually au_xino_create2() behaves in this manner. Then why didn't I apply the same way to this au_xino_create()? It is just because of my laziness. Calling VFS filp_open() here is easy for me. Reported-by: Kirill Kolyshkin <kolyshkin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit 30d9273f2a1ce331b1a79b770bdb4c493919a673)
-
- 09 Mar, 2019 31 commits
-
-
J. R. Okajima authored
Although I am not sure module_exit is necessary for the statically linked module, here is it. I hope it does no harm. Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
-
J. R. Okajima authored
They are historical options and a branch attribute. Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
-
J. R. Okajima authored
Fuse doesn't want the callers to access the inode attributes without issuing stat, and it is not assured that they are valid after lookup or iget(). The inode attribute is critical for aufs, and aufs decided to call stat every time for fuse. Of course, it makes aufs slow. But when the branch fs is not fuse, stat is not called. Currently, only FUSE implements ->poll(), and aufs supports it. Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
-
J. R. Okajima authored
Basically ramfs is limited for its size, and is not suitable for aufs RW branch. But people sometimes use it as RW branch without knowing it or with knowing it. This configuration is for those who knows what he is doing. Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
-
J. R. Okajima authored
Special support for filesystems which acquires an inode mutex at final closing a file, eg, hfsplus. This trick is very simple and stupid, just to open the file before really necessary open to tell hfsplus that this is not the final closing. The caller should call au_h_open_pre() after acquiring the inode mutex, and au_h_open_post() after releasing it. Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
-
J. R. Okajima authored
Still I am not sure how this feature breaches the security. Some people say it doesn't matter. But I don't know. Anyway upon the request from the users, aufs implements it as a module option. Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
-
J. R. Okajima authored
It is ok that the branch is loopback-mounted. But it had a problem if the backend fs-image is placed on another branch, and aufs had prohibited such nested branch for a long time due to the recursive lookup by 'loopN' daemon. I don't remember when it was, but the daemon stopped such recursive behaviour, but aufs is still prohibitting the nested branch via loopback-mount. Upon the request from users, aufs will allow the loopback-mounted branch on another branch by another patch (aufs4-loopback.patch in aufs4-standalone.git). Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
-
J. R. Okajima authored
This feature automatically handles MVDOWN in other commits. In user-space, a daemon monitors the free space of the branch and issues MVDOWN ioctl automatically when necessary. The main role is in user-space and several options are implemented. For a branch to join the FHSM circle, a new attribute 'fhsm' should be specified. See also the document in this commit. Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
-
J. R. Okajima authored
When these attributes are specified and aufs tries opening a file on that branch, aufs copies/moves it up. Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
-
J. R. Okajima authored
Support for the options of MVDOWN feature, which allows to overwrite the existing entry, and writing to the branch even if its permission is RO. Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
-
J. R. Okajima authored
Another ioctl feature, move-down. The behaviour is, as you can guess, the opposite of copy-up. The feature called FHSM (file-based hierarchical storage management, in later commit) uses this ioctl aggressively. See also the document in this commit. Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
-
J. R. Okajima authored
Because of some inode is in use, the deletion of a branch can fail. For those who wants to test the inode is busy or not, aufs provides an ioctl, and a utility 'aubusy' in aufs-util.git. Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
-
J. R. Okajima authored
For a directory which has millions of files, aufs VDIR consumes much memory. In this case, RDU (readdir(3) in user-space) is definitely better. If you enable CONFIG_AUFS_RDU at compiling aufs, install libau.so from aufs-util.git, and set some environment variables, then you can use this feature. When readdir(3) in libau.so receives an aufs dir, it issues ioctl(2) instead of regular readdir(3). All merging and whiteout handling are done in userspace. Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
-
J. R. Okajima authored
Provide info about the branches, which will be used from user-space. This is essentially equivalent to the entries under sysfs (/sys/fs/aufs/si_*/). But the ioctl behaviour is atomic and never confuse the matching of the branch id. Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
-
J. R. Okajima authored
Provide a file descriptor corresponding the specified writable branch. The file descriptor will be used from user-space such as FHSM and libau.so. For details, see aufs-util.git. Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
-
J. R. Okajima authored
Print the current data status for debugging. The trigger key is a module parameter and you can freely change. The default is 'a' of course. Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
-
J. R. Okajima authored
Simple checks when the module is loaded. This feature is compiled when CONFIG_AUFS_DEBUG is enabled. Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
-
J. R. Okajima authored
Aufs provides some info via debugfs such as - the branch path - the current number of pseudo-links - the size and the number of consumed blocks by XINO, XIB and XIGEN. Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
-
J. R. Okajima authored
These are very old options. Since Unionfs created 'diropq' unconditionally in mkdir(2), old users may expect the same behaviour. But there are cases where 'diropq' is unnecessary. The aufs default behaviour is to create 'diropq' only when it is necessary. Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
-
J. R. Okajima authored
Generally aufs hides the name of whiteouts. But in some cases, to show them is very useful for users. For instance, creating a new middle layer (branch) by merging existing layers. See also the document in this commit. Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
-
J. R. Okajima authored
While most people (especially who use tmpfs as top writable branch) doesn't care, I care and think it can be a security problem. For example, when the lower readonly branch may contain /etc/{passwd,shadow} and the permission bits of the upper empty branch is world-writable, then a malicious user can make these files manually with by-passing aufs. Aufs can do nothing but produce a warning. For details, see aufs manual in aufs-util.git. Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
-
J. R. Okajima authored
Introduce the new mount options, dirren and nodirren, which activates and deactivates DIRREN feature. In remount and unmount, the inum-list per branch should be flushed to the file. Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
-
J. R. Okajima authored
When aufs meets a new dir inode on a branch in lookup, it tests whether the inode is in the list which the branch has. If the inode is found, it means the dir has ever been logically renamed and there is some info about the name under that dir. Then aufs tries loading the info, and continues looking up using the before-renamed name on the lower branches. Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
-
J. R. Okajima authored
When DIRREN is enabled and activated, the error case where aufs rename(2) used to return EXDEV will be gone. Aufs rename(2) registers the renaming dir inum to the list in the branch, creates the detailed info file, and returns a success. If udba=notify option is specified with dirren, the internal detection may not work correctly since aufs may not be able to find the target name. Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
-
J. R. Okajima authored
The detailed info per renamed directory is stored in a regular file per branch, ie. when each of two lower branches contains the same named entry, then the created info files will be two. The file is created internally by aufs rename(2) and loaded by lookup. Also when the actual rename on the branch fails, the newly created or stored info file should be all reverted. When the renamed dir is renamed-back to the previous/original name, then the info file has to be removed. Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
-
J. R. Okajima authored
DIRREN gives an identifier to every branch, and it is used as a part of the filename of the detailed info file. Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
-
J. R. Okajima authored
This commits brings a list of the inode numbers which indicates the logically renamed dir into a branch. The list will be referred in lookup, and its lifetime is equivalent to the branch's, ie. the list is loaded/created in adding a branch, and stored/deleted in deleting a branch. The simple storing happens in remounting and unmounting aufs too. Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
-
J. R. Okajima authored
Since aufs can have multiple writable branches, these options are useful. Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
-
J. R. Okajima authored
This is a feature to optimize for rmdir and rename dir. When the number of whiteouts under the target dir is very many, it may take a long time to remove them all. To prevent this, 'dirwh=%d' option specifies the watermark to decide when to remove them. For details, see aufs manual in aufs-util.git. Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
-
J. R. Okajima authored
Sometimes the aufs policy to respect the branch fs's permission bits makes users confused. IE. the direcotry permission bits on the top branch allows users to read, but the lower branch prohibts. This option may be useful for such case. See also the document in this commit. Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
-
J. R. Okajima authored
The permissions and attributes of a branch can be modified dynamically. See also the document in this commit. Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05g@gmail.com>
-