-
Ian Campbell authored
In the first case: pio.c: In function ‘main’: pio.c:355:4: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] usage(0); ^~~~~~~~ pio.c:356:3: note: here case 'm': ^~~~ The fallthrough is not intended because `usage()` never returns (it calls `exit` unconditionally). Annotate as `noreturn` so the compiler realises this. In the second case: fexc.c: In function ‘main’: fexc.c:312:15: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] filename[1] = argv[optind+1]; /* out */ ~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ fexc.c:313:2: note: here case 1: ^~~~ The fallthrough appears to be intended (the two argument case is a superset of the one argument case). Annotate with a comment which tells the compiler this is intended. Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
585cb1d4