Commit 5443f2be authored by Achin Gupta's avatar Achin Gupta Committed by Dan Handley
Browse files

remove empty definition of display_boot_progress()

This patch replaces the empty definition of display_boot_progress() in
bl2_main.c with a weak definition. The former allowed bl2 to use the
early_exceptions(). It is possible to do that with a simple weak
definition as well.

Change-Id: Idb3f425a5e265f3579b638e3d26bd8c9bb78f80d
parent 3a4cae05
......@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
#include <runtime_svc.h>
.globl early_exceptions
.weak display_boot_progress
.section .text, "ax"; .align 11
......@@ -214,3 +214,15 @@ SErrorA32:
mov x0, #SERROR_AARCH32
bl plat_report_exception
b SErrorA32
.align 7
/* -----------------------------------------------------
* BL1 redefines this function to print the fact that
* BL2 has done its job and BL31 is about to be loaded.
* This weak definition allows other bootloader stages
* to use the 'early_exceptions' without running into
* compilation errors.
* -----------------------------------------------------
*/
display_boot_progress:
ret
......@@ -128,17 +128,3 @@ void bl2_main(void)
/* There is no valid reason for run_image() to return */
assert(0);
}
/*******************************************************************************
* BL1 has this function to print the fact that BL2 has done its job and BL31 is
* about to be loaded. Since BL2 re-uses BL1's exception table, it needs to
* define this function as well.
* TODO: Remove this function from BL2.
******************************************************************************/
void display_boot_progress(unsigned long entrypoint,
unsigned long spsr,
unsigned long mem_layout,
unsigned long ns_image_info)
{
return;
}
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment