1. 05 May, 2020 1 commit
    • Andre Przywara's avatar
      plat/stm32: Use generic fdt_get_reg_props_by_name() · 7ad6d362
      Andre Przywara authored
      
      
      The STM32 platform port parse DT nodes to find base address to
      peripherals. It does this by using its own implementation, even though
      this functionality is generic and actually widely useful outside of the
      STM32 code.
      
      Re-implement fdt_get_reg_props_by_name() on top of the newly introduced
      fdt_get_reg_props_by_index() function, and move it to fdt_wrapper.c.
      This is removes the assumption that #address-cells and #size-cells are
      always one.
      
      Change-Id: I6d584930262c732b6e0356d98aea50b2654f789d
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAndre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
      7ad6d362
  2. 04 May, 2020 1 commit
    • Manish Pandey's avatar
      Merge changes from topic "fdt_wrappers_rework" into integration · 65808674
      Manish Pandey authored
      * changes:
        arm: fconf: Fix GICv3 dynamic configuration
        plat/stm32: Implement fdt_read_uint32_default() as a wrapper
        fdt/wrappers: Replace fdtw_read_cells() implementation
        plat/stm32: Use generic fdt_read_uint32_array() implementation
        fdt/wrappers: Generalise fdtw_read_array()
      65808674
  3. 30 Apr, 2020 1 commit
    • Andre Przywara's avatar
      arm: fconf: Fix GICv3 dynamic configuration · 364ad245
      Andre Przywara authored
      
      
      At the moment the fconf_populate_gicv3_config() implementation is
      somewhat incomplete: First it actually fails to store the retrieved
      information (the local addr[] array is going nowhere), but also it makes
      quite some assumptions about the device tree passed to it: it needs to
      use two address-cells and two size-cells, and also requires all five
      register regions to be specified, where actually only the first two
      are mandatory according to the binding (and needed by our code).
      
      Fix this by introducing a proper generic function to retrieve "reg"
      property information from a DT node:
      We retrieve the #address-cells and #size-cells properties from the
      parent node, then use those to extract the right values from the "reg"
      property. The function takes an index to select one region of a reg
      property.
      
      This is loosely based on the STM32 implementation using "reg-names",
      which we will subsume in a follow-up patch.
      
      Change-Id: Ia59bfdf80aea4e36876c7b6ed4d153e303f482e8
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAndre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
      364ad245
  4. 29 Apr, 2020 2 commits
    • Andre Przywara's avatar
      plat/stm32: Implement fdt_read_uint32_default() as a wrapper · be858cff
      Andre Przywara authored
      
      
      The STM32 platform code uses its own set of FDT helper functions,
      although some of them are fairly generic.
      
      Remove the implementation of fdt_read_uint32_default() and implement it
      on top of the newly introduced fdt_read_uint32() function, then convert
      all users over.
      
      This also fixes two callers, which were slightly abusing the "default"
      semantic.
      
      Change-Id: I570533362b4846e58dd797a92347de3e0e5abb75
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAndre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
      be858cff
    • Andre Przywara's avatar
      fdt/wrappers: Replace fdtw_read_cells() implementation · ff4e6c35
      Andre Przywara authored
      Our fdtw_read_cells() implementation goes to great lengths to
      sanity-check every parameter and result, but leaves a big hole open:
      The size of the storage the value pointer points at needs to match the
      number of cells given. This can't be easily checked at compile time,
      since we lose the size information by using a void pointer.
      Regardless the current usage of this function is somewhat wrong anyways,
      since we use it on single-element, fixed-length properties only, for
      which the DT binding specifies the size.
      Typically we use those functions dealing with a number of cells in DT
      context to deal with *dynamically* sized properties, which depend on
      other properties (#size-cells, #clock-cells, ...), to specify the number
      of cells needed.
      
      Another problem with the current implementation is the use of
      ambiguously sized types (uintptr_t, size_t) together with a certain
      expectation about their size. In general there is no relation between
      the length of a DT property and the bitness of the code that parses the
      DTB: AArch64 code could encounter 32-bit addresses (where the physical
      address space is limited to 4GB [1]), while AArch32 code could read
      64-bit sized properties (/memory nodes on LPAE systems, [2]).
      
      To make this more clear, fix the potential issues and also align more
      with other DT users (Linux and U-Boot), introduce functions to explicitly
      read uint32 and uint64 properties. As the other DT consumers, we do this
      based on the generic "read array" function.
      Convert all users to use either of those two new functions, and make
      sure we never use a pointer to anything other than uint32_t or uint64_t
      variables directly.
      
      This reveals (and fixes) a bug in plat_spmd_manifest.c, where we write
      4 bytes into a uint16_t variable (passed via a void pointer).
      
      Also we change the implementation of the function to better align with
      other libfdt users, by using the right types (fdt32_t) and common
      variable names (*prop, prop_names).
      
      [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi#n874
      [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm/boot/dts/ecx-2000.dts
      
      
      
      Change-Id: I718de960515117ac7a3331a1b177d2ec224a3890
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAndre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
      ff4e6c35
  5. 28 Apr, 2020 2 commits
    • Andre Przywara's avatar
      plat/stm32: Use generic fdt_read_uint32_array() implementation · 52a616b4
      Andre Przywara authored
      
      
      The device tree parsing code for the STM32 platform is using its own FDT
      helper functions, some of them being rather generic.
      In particular the existing fdt_read_uint32_array() implementation is now
      almost identical to the new generic code in fdt_wrappers.c, so we can
      remove the ST specific version and adjust the existing callers.
      
      Compared to the original ST implementation the new version takes a
      pointer to the DTB as the first argument, and also swaps the order of
      the number of cells and the pointer.
      
      Change-Id: Id06b0f1ba4db1ad1f733be40e82c34f46638551a
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAndre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
      52a616b4
    • Andre Przywara's avatar
      fdt/wrappers: Generalise fdtw_read_array() · 6e3a89f4
      Andre Przywara authored
      
      
      Currently our fdtw_read_array() implementation requires the length of
      the property to exactly match the requested size, which makes it less
      flexible for parsing generic device trees.
      Also the name is slightly misleading, since we treat the cells of the
      array as 32 bit unsigned integers, performing the endianess conversion.
      
      To fix those issues and align the code more with other DT users (Linux
      kernel or U-Boot), rename the function to "fdt_read_uint32_array", and
      relax the length check to only check if the property covers at least the
      number of cells we request.
      This also changes the variable names to be more in-line with other DT
      users, and switches to the proper data types.
      
      This makes this function more useful in later patches.
      
      Change-Id: Id86f4f588ffcb5106d4476763ecdfe35a735fa6c
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAndre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
      6e3a89f4
  6. 27 Apr, 2020 1 commit
  7. 25 Apr, 2020 1 commit
    • Masahiro Yamada's avatar
      linker_script: move .data section to bl_common.ld.h · caa3e7e0
      Masahiro Yamada authored
      Move the data section to the common header.
      
      I slightly tweaked some scripts as follows:
      
      [1] bl1.ld.S has ALIGN(16). I added DATA_ALIGN macro, which is 1
          by default, but overridden by bl1.ld.S. Currently, ALIGN(16)
          of the .data section is redundant because commit 41286590
      
      
          ("Fix boot failures on some builds linked with ld.lld.") padded
          out the previous section to work around the issue of LLD version
          <= 10.0. This will be fixed in the future release of LLVM, so
          I am keeping the proper way to align LMA.
      
      [2] bl1.ld.S and bl2_el3.ld.S define __DATA_RAM_{START,END}__ instead
          of __DATA_{START,END}__. I put them out of the .data section.
      
      [3] SORT_BY_ALIGNMENT() is missing tsp.ld.S, sp_min.ld.S, and
          mediatek/mt6795/bl31.ld.S. This commit adds SORT_BY_ALIGNMENT()
          for all images, so the symbol order in those three will change,
          but I do not think it is a big deal.
      
      Change-Id: I215bb23c319f045cd88e6f4e8ee2518c67f03692
      Signed-off-by: default avatarMasahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
      caa3e7e0
  8. 24 Apr, 2020 3 commits
    • Masahiro Yamada's avatar
      linker_script: move stacks section to bl_common.ld.h · a926a9f6
      Masahiro Yamada authored
      
      
      The stacks section is the same for all BL linker scripts.
      
      Move it to the common header file.
      
      Change-Id: Ibd253488667ab4f69702d56ff9e9929376704f6c
      Signed-off-by: default avatarMasahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
      a926a9f6
    • Masahiro Yamada's avatar
      bl1: remove '.' from stacks section in linker script · b9f7b57d
      Masahiro Yamada authored
      Only BL1 specifies '.' in the address field of the stacks section.
      
      Commit 4f59d835 ("Make BL1 RO and RW base addresses configurable")
      added '.' on purpose but the commit message does not help to understand
      why.
      
      This commit gets rid of it in order to factor out the stacks section
      into include/common/bl_common.ld.h
      
      I compared the build result for PLAT=qemu.
      
      'aarch64-linux-gnu-nm -n build/qemu/release/bl1/bl1.elf' will change
      as follows:
      
      @@ -336,8 +336,8 @@
       000000000e04e0e0 d max_log_level
       000000000e04e0e4 D console_state
       000000000e04e0e5 D __DATA_RAM_END__
      -000000000e04e0e5 B __STACKS_START__
       000000000e04e100 b platform_normal_stacks
      +000000000e04e100 B __STACKS_START__
       000000000e04f100 b bl1_cpu_context
       000000000e04f100 B __BSS_START__
       000000000e04f100 B __STACKS_END__
      
      After this change, __STACKS_START__ will match to platform_normal_stacks,
      and I think it makes more sense.
      
      'aarch64-linux-gnu-objdump -h build/qemu/release/bl1/bl1.elf' will change
      as follows:
      
      @@ -9,11 +9,11 @@
                         CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, READONLY, DATA
         2 .data         000000e5  000000000e04e000  0000000000004a60  0001e000  2**4
                         CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, DATA
      -  3 stacks        0000101b  000000000e04e0e5  000000000e04e0e5  0001e0e5  2**6
      +  3 stacks        00001000  000000000e04e100  0000000000004b45  0001e100  2**6
                         ALLOC
      -  4 .bss          000007e0  000000000e04f100  000000000e04f100  0001e0e5  2**5
      +  4 .bss          000007e0  000000000e04f100  0000000000004b50  0001f100  2**5
                         ALLOC
      -  5 xlat_table    00006000  000000000e050000  000000000e050000  0001e0e5  2**12
      +  5 xlat_table    00006000  000000000e050000  0000000000004b45  00020000  2**12
                         ALLOC
         6 coherent_ram  00000000  000000000e056000  000000000e056000  0001f000  2**12
                         CONTENTS
      
      Sandrine pointed me to a useful document [1] to understand why LMAs of
      stacks, .bss, and xlat_table section have changed.
      
      Before this patch, they fell into this scenario:
       "If the section has a specific VMA address, then this is used as the
        LMA address as well."
      
      With this commit, the following applies:
       "Otherwise if a memory region can be found that is compatible with the
        current section, and this region contains at least one section, then
        the LMA is set so the difference between the VMA and LMA is the same
        as the difference between the VMA and LMA of the last section in the
        located region."
      
      Anyway, those three sections are not loaded, so the LMA changes will not
      be a problem. The size of bl1.bin is still the same.
      
      QEMU still boots successfully with this change.
      
      A good thing is, this fixes the error for the latest LLD. If I use the
      mainline LLVM, I see the following error. The alignment check will probably
      be included in the LLVM 11 release, so it is better to fix it now.
      
      $ PLAT=qemu CC=clang CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-linux-gnu-
        [ snip ]
      ld.lld: error: address (0xe04e0e5) of section stacks is not a multiple of alignment (64)
      make: *** [Makefile:1050: build/qemu/release/bl1/bl1.elf] Error 1
      
      [1]: https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs/ld/Output-Section-LMA.html#Output-Section-LMA
      
      
      
      Change-Id: I3d2f3cc2858be8b3ce2eab3812a76d1e0b5f3a32
      Signed-off-by: default avatarMasahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
      b9f7b57d
    • Sandrine Bailleux's avatar
  9. 23 Apr, 2020 4 commits
  10. 22 Apr, 2020 1 commit
  11. 21 Apr, 2020 2 commits
  12. 20 Apr, 2020 2 commits
  13. 17 Apr, 2020 6 commits
  14. 16 Apr, 2020 7 commits
  15. 15 Apr, 2020 6 commits