- 17 Jun, 2013 1 commit
-
-
Siarhei Siamashka authored
-
- 12 Jun, 2013 4 commits
-
-
Harm Hanemaaijer authored
Benchmark tests reveal that xorg's fb layer PutImage implementation does not follow on optimal code path for requests without special raster operations, which is due to the use of a slower general blit function instead of the pixman library. This affects Xlib PutImage requests and some ShmPutImage requests. In the case of ShmPutImage, xorg directs ShmPutImage requests to PutImage only if the width of the part of the image to be copied is equal to the full width of the image, resulting in relatively poor performance. If the width of the part of the image that is copied is smaller than the full image, then xorg uses CopyArea which results in the use of the already optimal pixman blit functions. The sub-optimal path is commonly triggered by applications such as window managers and web browsers. To fix this unnecessary performance flaw, PutImage is replaced with a version that uses pixman for the common case of GXcopy and all plane masks sets. This change is device-independent and only uses pixman CPU blit functions that is already present in the xorg server. Using the low-level benchmark program benchx (https://github.com/hglm/benchx.git ), the following speed-ups were measured (1920x1080x32bpp) on an Allwinner A10 device: ShmPutImageFullWidth (5 x 5): Speed up 9% ShmPutImageFullWidth (7 x 7): Slow down 5% ShmPutImageFullWidth (22 x 22): Speed up 8% ShmPutImageFullWidth (49 x 49): Speed up 19% ShmPutImageFullWidth (73 x 73): Speed up 55% ShmPutImageFullWidth (109 x 109): Speed up 50% ShmPutImageFullWidth (163 x 163): Speed up 37% ShmPutImageFullWidth (244 x 244): Speed up 111% ShmPutImageFullWidth (366 x 366): Speed up 77% ShmPutImageFullWidth (549 x 549): Speed up 92% AlignedShmPutImageFullWidth (5 x 5): Slow down 14% AlignedShmPutImageFullWidth (7 x 7): Slow down 6% AlignedShmPutImageFullWidth (15 x 15): Speed up 10% AlignedShmPutImageFullWidth (22 x 22): Speed up 9% AlignedShmPutImageFullWidth (33 x 33): Speed up 21% AlignedShmPutImageFullWidth (49 x 49): Speed up 28% AlignedShmPutImageFullWidth (73 x 73): Speed up 30% AlignedShmPutImageFullWidth (109 x 109): Speed up 47% AlignedShmPutImageFullWidth (163 x 163): Speed up 38% AlignedShmPutImageFullWidth (244 x 244): Speed up 63% AlignedShmPutImageFullWidth (366 x 366): Speed up 84% AlignedShmPutImageFullWidth (549 x 549): Speed up 89% At 16bpp the speed-up is even greater: ShmPutImageFullWidth (5 x 5): Slow down 8% ShmPutImageFullWidth (7 x 7): Slow down 8% ShmPutImageFullWidth (10 x 10): Slow down 6% ShmPutImageFullWidth (22 x 22): Speed up 9% ShmPutImageFullWidth (33 x 33): Speed up 20% ShmPutImageFullWidth (49 x 49): Speed up 27% ShmPutImageFullWidth (73 x 73): Speed up 69% ShmPutImageFullWidth (109 x 109): Speed up 74% ShmPutImageFullWidth (163 x 163): Speed up 100% ShmPutImageFullWidth (244 x 244): Speed up 111% ShmPutImageFullWidth (366 x 366): Speed up 133% ShmPutImageFullWidth (549 x 549): Speed up 123% AlignedShmPutImageFullWidth (5 x 5): Speed up 6% AlignedShmPutImageFullWidth (7 x 7): Slow down 9% AlignedShmPutImageFullWidth (10 x 10): Slow down 10% AlignedShmPutImageFullWidth (33 x 33): Speed up 17% AlignedShmPutImageFullWidth (49 x 49): Speed up 34% AlignedShmPutImageFullWidth (73 x 73): Speed up 49% AlignedShmPutImageFullWidth (109 x 109): Speed up 53% AlignedShmPutImageFullWidth (163 x 163): Speed up 69% AlignedShmPutImageFullWidth (244 x 244): Speed up 82% AlignedShmPutImageFullWidth (366 x 366): Speed up 116% AlignedShmPutImageFullWidth (549 x 549): Speed up 110% Signed-off-by: Harm Hanemaaijer <fgenfb@yahoo.com>
-
Siarhei Siamashka authored
This should be useful for Raspberry Pi. When reading uncached source buffers, the VFP optimized overlapped two-pass blit is roughly 2-3 times slower than memcpy in cached memory. Which makes it reasonably competitive compared to ShadowFB (considering that ShadowFB allocates an extra buffer, does extra memory copies which take time and thrash L2 cache, etc.). It even provides a slight performance advantage in a more or less realistic use case (scrolling in xterm), which needs reads from the framebuffer: ==== Before (xf86-video-fbdev with ShadowFB) ==== $ time DISPLAY=:0 xterm +j -maximized -e cat longtext.txt real 1m50.245s user 0m1.750s sys 0m0.800s ==== After (xf86-video-sunxifb without ShadowFB) ==== $ time DISPLAY=:0 xterm +j -maximized -e cat longtext.txt real 1m27.709s user 0m1.690s sys 0m0.920s We get decent results even when reading from the framebuffer. However in many typical workloads (excluding scrolling and dragging windows) the framebuffer is primarily used as write-only. In write-only use cases ShadowFB is just pure overhead. So getting rid of it is a very good idea as this improves overall graphics performance. Signed-off-by: Siarhei Siamashka <siarhei.siamashka@gmail.com>
-
Siarhei Siamashka authored
A small typo in a function argument and C compiler happily accepting void pointers instead of something else is a dangerous combo. Need to be more careful. Signed-off-by: Siarhei Siamashka <siarhei.siamashka@gmail.com>
-
Siarhei Siamashka authored
This patch implements a heuristics, which enables backing store for some windows. When backing store is enabled for a window, the window gets a backing pixmap (via automatic redirection provided by composite extension). It acts a bit similar to ShadowFB, but for individual windows. The advantage of backing store is that we can avoid "expose event -> redraw" animated trail in the exposed area when dragging another window on top of it. Dragging windows becomes much smoother and faster. But the disadvantage of backing store is the same as for ShadowFB. That's a loss of precious RAM, extra buffer copy when somebody tries to update window content, potentially skip of some frames on fast animation (they just do not reach screen). Also hardware accelerated scrolling does not currently work for the windows with backing store enabled. We try to make the best use of backing store by enabling backing store for all the windows that are direct children of root, except the one which has keyboard focus (either directly or via one of its children). In practice this heuristics seems to provide nearly perfect results: 1) dragging windows is fast and smooth. 2) the top level window with the keyboard focus (typically the application that a user is working with) is G2D accelerated and does not suffer from any intermediate buffer copy overhead. Signed-off-by: Siarhei Siamashka <siarhei.siamashka@gmail.com>
-
- 10 Jun, 2013 1 commit
-
-
Siarhei Siamashka authored
Signed-off-by: Siarhei Siamashka <siarhei.siamashka@gmail.com>
-
- 07 Jun, 2013 2 commits
-
-
Siarhei Siamashka authored
With the fallback to CPU backend for unsupported blits and also threshold for avoiding small blits, now G2D should always provide best overall performance. The users of recent versions of xf86-video-sunxifb are supposed to also have a reasonably recent version of linux-sunxi kernel. Which includes the following fix: https://github.com/linux-sunxi/linux-sunxi/commit/3d49345343a1535b The users of old kernels are going to see screen corruption on dragging windows and scrolling. They just should upgrade :) Signed-off-by: Siarhei Siamashka <siarhei.siamashka@gmail.com>
-
Siarhei Siamashka authored
The G2D driver only supports framebuffer->framebuffer blits and also can't be used to accelerate dragging windows to the right (without hacking the kernel driver to do two-pass blit there). This patch adds fallback to NEON optimized CPU backend instead of resorting to use poorly performing fbBlt in these cases. Note: we assume that ioctls normally do not fail (even if they do, the slow old style fallback to fbBlt is not the worst thing to worry about). Signed-off-by: Siarhei Siamashka <siarhei.siamashka@gmail.com>
-
- 05 Jun, 2013 1 commit
-
-
Siarhei Siamashka authored
Using VFP, we can load up to 128 bytes with a single VLDM instruction. But before this patch, only NEON implementation was available. Just because it showed better results on Allwinner A10 compared to VFP. And this DDX driver used to primarily target just sunxi hardware. But looks like it makes sense to also target other devices (at least ODROID-X, which has the same Mali400 GPU and can use the same DRI2 integration for EGL and GLESv2 support). And on the other ARM devices, VFP aligned reads generally work better than NEON. The benchmark results are listed below: 1280x720, 32bpp, testing "x11perf -scroll500" == Exynos 5250, Cortex-A15, Non-cacheable streaming enhancement disabled == NEON : 10000 trep @ 3.7101 msec ( 270.0/sec): Scroll 500x500 pixels VFP : 10000 trep @ 2.6678 msec ( 375.0/sec): Scroll 500x500 pixels == Exynos 5250, Cortex-A15, Non-cacheable streaming enhancement enabled == NEON : 15000 trep @ 2.2568 msec ( 443.0/sec): Scroll 500x500 pixels VFP : 15000 trep @ 2.3016 msec ( 434.0/sec): Scroll 500x500 pixels == Exynos 4412, Cortex-A9 == NEON : 10000 trep @ 4.5125 msec ( 222.0/sec): Scroll 500x500 pixels VFP : 10000 trep @ 2.7015 msec ( 370.0/sec): Scroll 500x500 pixels == TI DM3730, Cortex-A8 == NEON : 15000 trep @ 2.2303 msec ( 448.0/sec): Scroll 500x500 pixels VFP : 10000 trep @ 3.0670 msec ( 326.0/sec): Scroll 500x500 pixels == Allwinner A10, Cortex-A8 == NEON : 10000 trep @ 2.5559 msec ( 391.0/sec): Scroll 500x500 pixels VFP : 10000 trep @ 3.0580 msec ( 327.0/sec): Scroll 500x500 pixels == Raspberry Pi, BCM2708, ARM1176 == VFP : 3000 trep @ 8.7699 msec ( 114.0/sec): Scroll 500x500 pixels The benchmark numbers in this particular test setup roughly represent memory copy bandwidth measured in MB/s (when doing overlapped blits inside of a writecombine mapped framebuffer). ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: the use of VFP two-pass overlapped copy instead of ShadowFB is still not enabled by default when running on Raspberry Pi because the performance results are not so great. Signed-off-by: Siarhei Siamashka <siarhei.siamashka@gmail.com>
-
- 03 Jun, 2013 1 commit
-
-
Siarhei Siamashka authored
This is my old ARM9E/ARM11 memcpy code from https://garage.maemo.org/projects/mplayer/ with some tuning for Raspberry Pi (aligned prefetch added). Will be used by VFP optimized overlapped blt function. Signed-off-by: Siarhei Siamashka <siarhei.siamashka@gmail.com>
-
- 02 Jun, 2013 2 commits
-
-
Harm Hanemaaijer authored
When source and destination coordinates allow it, a 16bpp screen-to- screen blit is divided into up to three segments: two optional one pixel wide edges and an aligned middle segment that is copied in 32-bit mode. This patch adds the low-level function sunxi_g2d_blit_r5g6b5_in_three and adds logic to the general blit function to use it for 16bpp to 16bpp blits if the source and destination coordinates allow it. This patch automatically enables the use of this optimization in the sunxi G2D X driver. The area threshold for using G2D for 16bpp-to-16bpp blits was introduced in a previous patch. Benchmarks: 1920x1080x16bpp@60Hz, ShadowFB disabled: x11perf -scroll100 Before: 350000 trep @ 0.0881 msec ( 11400.0/sec): Scroll 100x100 pixels After: 350000 trep @ 0.0819 msec ( 12200.0/sec): Scroll 100x100 pixels x11perf -scroll500 Before: 20000 trep @ 1.3547 msec ( 738.0/sec): Scroll 500x500 pixels After: 35000 trep @ 0.8005 msec ( 1250.0/sec): Scroll 500x500 pixels Signed-off-by: Harm Hanemaaijer <fgenfb@yahoo.com>
-
Harm Hanemaaijer authored
Due to the overhead of G2D for small screen-to-screen blits, CPU blits are faster for small areas. This patch introduces are threshold below which CPU blits are triggered. It is currently set to 1000 for 32bpp and 2500 for 16bpp based on test results. Some benchmarks: 1920x1080x16bppx60Hz, ShadowFB disabled: x11perf -scroll10 Before: 1500000 trep @ 0.0239 msec ( 41800.0/sec): Scroll 10x10 pixels After: 2500000 trep @ 0.0110 msec ( 90900.0/sec): Scroll 10x10 pixels x11perf -copywinwin10 Before: 1200000 trep @ 0.0247 msec ( 40500.0/sec): Copy 10x10 from window to window After: 1800000 trep @ 0.0146 msec ( 68600.0/sec): Copy 10x10 from window to window Signed-off-by: Harm Hanemaaijer <fgenfb@yahoo.com>
-
- 22 Apr, 2013 1 commit
-
-
Siarhei Siamashka authored
This test program exposes a problem related to window resizing (or going fullscreen), which is may happen exactly between "back" and "front" DRI2 buffers allocation. The xtrace log with some annotations: 000:<:004c: 8: DRI2-Request(151,3): CreateDrawable drawable=0x02200001 000:<:004d: 16: DRI2-Request(151,5): GetBuffers drawable=0x02200001 attachments={attachment=BackLeft(0x00000001)}; 000:>:004d:52: Reply to GetBuffers: width=480 height=480 buffers={attachment=BackLeft(0x00000001) name=0x00000157 pitch=1920 cpp=4 flags=0x00000000}; Get the BackLeft buffer. 000:<:004e: 4: Request(43): GetInputFocus 000:>:004e:32: Reply to GetInputFocus: revert-to=PointerRoot(0x01) focus=0x02200001 000:<:004f: 24: Request(16): InternAtom only-if-exists=false(0x00) name='_NET_WM_STATE' 000:>:004f:32: Reply to InternAtom: atom=0xff("_NET_WM_STATE") 000:<:0050: 32: Request(16): InternAtom only-if-exists=false(0x00) name='_NET_WM_STATE_FULLSCREEN' 000:>:0050:32: Reply to InternAtom: atom=0x102("_NET_WM_STATE_FULLSCREEN") 000:<:0051: 44: Request(25): SendEvent propagate=false(0x00) destination=0x00000170 event-mask=SubstructureNotify,SubstructureRedirect ClientMessage(33) format=0x20 window=0x02200001 type=0xff("_NET_WM_STATE") data=0x01,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x02,0x01,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00; 000:<:0052: 4: Request(43): GetInputFocus 000:>:0052: Event DRI2-InvalidateBuffers(102) drawable=0x02200001 Here the X server attempts to notify the client side DRI2 code in the Mali blob that the DRI2 buffer must be requested again. But this event gets happily ignored. 000:>:0052: Event Expose(12) window=0x02200001 x=0 y=0 width=1920 height=1080 count=0x0000 000:>:0052:32: Reply to GetInputFocus: revert-to=PointerRoot(0x01) focus=0x02200001 000:<:0053: 8: Request(3): GetWindowAttributes window=0x02200001 000:<:0054: 8: Request(14): GetGeometry drawable=0x02200001 000:>:0053:44: Reply to GetWindowAttributes: backing-store=NotUseful(0x00) visual=0x00000021 class=InputOutput(0x0001) bit-gravity=Forget(0x00) win-gravity=NorthWest(0x01) backing-planes=0xffffffff backing-pixel=0x00000000 save-under=false(0x00) map-is-installed=true(0x01) map-state=Viewable(0x02) override-redirect=false(0x00) colormap=0x00000020 all-event-masks=PointerMotion,Exposure,StructureNotify,FocusChange,PropertyChange your-event-mask=PointerMotion,Exposure do-not-propagate-mask=0 unused=0x0000 000:>:0054:32: Reply to GetGeometry: depth=0x18 root=0x00000170 x=0 y=0 width=1920 height=1080 border-width=0 001:<:000c: 12: Request(98): QueryExtension name='DRI2' 001:>:000c:32: Reply to QueryExtension: present=true(0x01) major-opcode=151 first-event=101 first-error=0 001:<:000d: 32: DRI2-Request(151,8): SwapBuffers drawable=0x02200001 target_msc_hi=0 target_msc_lo=0 divisor_hi=0 divisor_lo=0 remainder_hi=0 remainder_lo=0 001:>:000d: Event DRI2-BufferSwapComplete(101) drawable=0x00000002 ust_hi=35651585 ust_lo=0 msc_hi=0 msc_lo=0 sbc_hi=0 sbc_lo=1 Here the DRI2 code from the Mali blob tries to swap buffers (with the hope that the allocated BackLeft would go to front) 001:>:000d:32: Reply to SwapBuffers: swap_hi=0 swap_lo=4096 000:<:0055: 8: DRI2-Request(151,3): CreateDrawable drawable=0x02200001 000:<:0056: 16: DRI2-Request(151,5): GetBuffers drawable=0x02200001 attachments={attachment=BackLeft(0x00000001)}; 000:>:0056:52: Reply to GetBuffers: width=1920 height=1080 buffers={attachment=BackLeft(0x00000001) name=0x00000159 pitch=7680 cpp=4 flags=0x00000000}; And requests for the new BackLeft DRI2 buffer. 000:<:0057: 4: Request(43): GetInputFocus 000:>:0057:32: Reply to GetInputFocus: revert-to=PointerRoot(0x01) focus=0x02200001 000:<:0058: 8: Request(3): GetWindowAttributes window=0x02200001 000:<:0059: 8: Request(14): GetGeometry drawable=0x02200001 000:>:0058:44: Reply to GetWindowAttributes: backing-store=NotUseful(0x00) visual=0x00000021 class=InputOutput(0x0001) bit-gravity=Forget(0x00) win-gravity=NorthWest(0x01) backing-planes=0xffffffff backing-pixel=0x00000000 save-under=false(0x00) map-is-installed=true(0x01) map-state=Viewable(0x02) override-redirect=false(0x00) colormap=0x00000020 all-event-masks=PointerMotion,Exposure,StructureNotify,FocusChange,PropertyChange your-event-mask=PointerMotion,Exposure do-not-propagate-mask=0 unused=0x0000 000:>:0059:32: Reply to GetGeometry: depth=0x18 root=0x00000170 x=0 y=0 width=1920 height=1080 border-width=0 000:<:005a: 8: Request(3): GetWindowAttributes window=0x02200001 000:<:005b: 8: Request(14): GetGeometry drawable=0x02200001 000:>:005a:44: Reply to GetWindowAttributes: backing-store=NotUseful(0x00) visual=0x00000021 class=InputOutput(0x0001) bit-gravity=Forget(0x00) win-gravity=NorthWest(0x01) backing-planes=0xffffffff backing-pixel=0x00000000 save-under=false(0x00) map-is-installed=true(0x01) map-state=Viewable(0x02) override-redirect=false(0x00) colormap=0x00000020 all-event-masks=PointerMotion,Exposure,StructureNotify,FocusChange,PropertyChange your-event-mask=PointerMotion,Exposure do-not-propagate-mask=0 unused=0x0000 000:>:005b:32: Reply to GetGeometry: depth=0x18 root=0x00000170 x=0 y=0 width=1920 height=1080 border-width=0 001:<:000e: 32: DRI2-Request(151,8): SwapBuffers drawable=0x02200001 target_msc_hi=0 target_msc_lo=0 divisor_hi=0 divisor_lo=0 remainder_hi=0 remainder_lo=0 001:>:000e: Event DRI2-BufferSwapComplete(101) drawable=0x00000002 ust_hi=35651585 ust_lo=0 msc_hi=0 msc_lo=0 sbc_hi=0 sbc_lo=2 And here it is simply swapping the buffers. 001:>:000e:32: Reply to SwapBuffers: swap_hi=0 swap_lo=4096 000:<:005c: 8: Request(3): GetWindowAttributes window=0x02200001 000:<:005d: 8: Request(14): GetGeometry drawable=0x02200001 000:>:005c:44: Reply to GetWindowAttributes: backing-store=NotUseful(0x00) visual=0x00000021 class=InputOutput(0x0001) bit-gravity=Forget(0x00) win-gravity=NorthWest(0x01) backing-planes=0xffffffff backing-pixel=0x00000000 save-under=false(0x00) map-is-installed=true(0x01) map-state=Viewable(0x02) override-redirect=false(0x00) colormap=0x00000020 all-event-masks=PointerMotion,Exposure,StructureNotify,FocusChange,PropertyChange your-event-mask=PointerMotion,Exposure do-not-propagate-mask=0 unused=0x0000 000:>:005d:32: Reply to GetGeometry: depth=0x18 root=0x00000170 x=0 y=0 width=1920 height=1080 border-width=0 And now it is polling for the change of window geometry. The same "SwapBuffers -> GetGeometry -> SwapBuffers" pattern keeps repeating. Signed-off-by: Siarhei Siamashka <siarhei.siamashka@gmail.com>
-
- 30 Mar, 2013 1 commit
-
-
Siarhei Siamashka authored
Should be useful for better performance when moving windows and scrolling on the devices without a dedicated 2D hardware accelerator (Allwinner A13). Signed-off-by: Siarhei Siamashka <siarhei.siamashka@gmail.com>
-
- 28 Mar, 2013 1 commit
-
-
Siarhei Siamashka authored
Just use "/dev/fb0" by default. Signed-off-by: Siarhei Siamashka <siarhei.siamashka@gmail.com>
-
- 26 Mar, 2013 3 commits
-
-
Siarhei Siamashka authored
The sunxi_x_g2d.c file contains the midlayer code for hooking the G2D optimized blit into xserver. But in fact it does not strictly need to depend on anything sunxi specific. So now we introduce a simple "blt2d_i" interface struct which specifically provides a pointer to the accelerated blit function. And just use this interface struct instead of the whole "sunxi_disp_t". This allows to easily reuse the same code for other non-G2D or even non-sunxi blit implementations in the future. Signed-off-by: Siarhei Siamashka <siarhei.siamashka@gmail.com>
-
Siarhei Siamashka authored
The 'main' function got there by accident and was not spotted earlier because the driver itself is a shared library. Signed-off-by: Siarhei Siamashka <siarhei.siamashka@gmail.com>
-
Siarhei Siamashka authored
Signed-off-by: Siarhei Siamashka <siarhei.siamashka@gmail.com>
-
- 22 Mar, 2013 2 commits
-
-
Siarhei Siamashka authored
This is still not perfect, because G2D can't saturate memory bandwidth for this color depth (it is fillrate limited). We should emulate 16bpp blits with 32bpp blits whenever it is possible. Signed-off-by: Siarhei Siamashka <siarhei.siamashka@gmail.com>
-
Siarhei Siamashka authored
It might be not statically compiled into kernel (for example in Fedora), so we should try to explictly load it. Signed-off-by: Siarhei Siamashka <siarhei.siamashka@gmail.com>
-
- 21 Mar, 2013 1 commit
-
-
Siarhei Siamashka authored
Now source and destination pixmaps don't need to be the same for using G2D acceleration (as long as both of them are allocated in the framebuffer). This allows using G2D to copy pixels from DRI2 buffers to the framebuffer on the fallback path (when the window of an OpenGL ES application is partially overlapped by some other windows). Though it only works when composite extension is disabled, for example by adding the following to xorg.conf: Section "Extensions" Option "Composite" "Disable" EndSection If composite extension is enabled, windows have backing pixmaps, and we have a longer chain of copies: DRI2 buffer -> backing pixmap -> framebuffer Because backing pixmap is not allocated in a physically contiguous memory, it can't be copied using G2D yet. Signed-off-by: Siarhei Siamashka <siarhei.siamashka@gmail.com>
-
- 19 Mar, 2013 1 commit
-
-
Siarhei Siamashka authored
Signed-off-by: Siarhei Siamashka <siarhei.siamashka@gmail.com>
-
- 18 Mar, 2013 1 commit
-
-
Siarhei Siamashka authored
Wrap CreateGC function to add a hook for CopyArea operation, which can be accelerated using G2D for the buffers inside of the visible part of the framebuffer. In the future we may try to also ensure that DRI2 buffers are copied using G2D instead of CPU in the case if we hit the fallback path and can't avoid this copy. Benchmark using "x11perf -scroll500 -copywinwin500": === ShadowFB (software rendering) === 3000 reps @ 2.0308 msec ( 492.0/sec): Scroll 500x500 pixels 3000 reps @ 1.9741 msec ( 507.0/sec): Scroll 500x500 pixels 3000 reps @ 1.9826 msec ( 504.0/sec): Scroll 500x500 pixels 3000 reps @ 1.9830 msec ( 504.0/sec): Scroll 500x500 pixels 3000 reps @ 1.9965 msec ( 501.0/sec): Scroll 500x500 pixels 15000 trep @ 1.9934 msec ( 502.0/sec): Scroll 500x500 pixels 1600 reps @ 3.3054 msec ( 303.0/sec): Copy 500x500 from window to window 1600 reps @ 3.3179 msec ( 301.0/sec): Copy 500x500 from window to window 1600 reps @ 3.2263 msec ( 310.0/sec): Copy 500x500 from window to window 1600 reps @ 3.2491 msec ( 308.0/sec): Copy 500x500 from window to window 1600 reps @ 3.2357 msec ( 309.0/sec): Copy 500x500 from window to window 8000 trep @ 3.2669 msec ( 306.0/sec): Copy 500x500 from window to window === G2D (hardware acceleration) === 3000 reps @ 2.1949 msec ( 456.0/sec): Scroll 500x500 pixels 3000 reps @ 2.1929 msec ( 456.0/sec): Scroll 500x500 pixels 3000 reps @ 2.1923 msec ( 456.0/sec): Scroll 500x500 pixels 3000 reps @ 2.1889 msec ( 457.0/sec): Scroll 500x500 pixels 3000 reps @ 2.1941 msec ( 456.0/sec): Scroll 500x500 pixels 15000 trep @ 2.1926 msec ( 456.0/sec): Scroll 500x500 pixels 2800 reps @ 1.8114 msec ( 552.0/sec): Copy 500x500 from window to window 2800 reps @ 1.8103 msec ( 552.0/sec): Copy 500x500 from window to window 2800 reps @ 1.8160 msec ( 551.0/sec): Copy 500x500 from window to window 2800 reps @ 1.8099 msec ( 553.0/sec): Copy 500x500 from window to window 2800 reps @ 1.8126 msec ( 552.0/sec): Copy 500x500 from window to window 14000 trep @ 1.8120 msec ( 552.0/sec): Copy 500x500 from window to window CPU usage remains low when running this test with G2D acceleration enabled. Signed-off-by: Siarhei Siamashka <siarhei.siamashka@gmail.com>
-
- 17 Mar, 2013 2 commits
-
-
Siarhei Siamashka authored
Reported-by: Maurice de la Ferté <kadava@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Siarhei Siamashka <siarhei.siamashka@gmail.com>
-
Siarhei Siamashka authored
Explain that AIGLX is normally expected to fail and the users should not really worry about it. Also provide a warning in the case if the driver has been compiled without libUMP support (it could be that the user actually wanted 3D acceleration, but just has not installed all the needed dependencies). Signed-off-by: Siarhei Siamashka <siarhei.siamashka@gmail.com>
-
- 16 Mar, 2013 1 commit
-
-
Siarhei Siamashka authored
Signed-off-by: Siarhei Siamashka <siarhei.siamashka@gmail.com>
-
- 15 Mar, 2013 2 commits
-
-
Siarhei Siamashka authored
Signed-off-by: Siarhei Siamashka <siarhei.siamashka@gmail.com>
-
Siarhei Siamashka authored
It measures MPix/s numbers for blit and fill operations done by G2D, and also for comparison tests the performance of the same operations done by pixman (software rendering). G2D has clock frequency configured to be half of the RAM clock frequency. So for 480 MHz RAM, we have G2D clocked at 240 MHz, which means that no more than 240 MPix can be processed per second. Unfortunately this limits the performance of a simple operation such as solid fill. Signed-off-by: Siarhei Siamashka <siarhei.siamashka@gmail.com>
-
- 14 Mar, 2013 2 commits
-
-
Siarhei Siamashka authored
This initial G2D support code can speed up moving windows in XFCE. Currently disabled by default, but can be enabled by editing /etc/X11/xorg.conf and adding the following line to the "Device" section: Option "AccelMethod" "G2D" Signed-off-by: Siarhei Siamashka <siarhei.siamashka@gmail.com>
-
Siarhei Siamashka authored
Avoid creating a new mapping because that's a waste of the virtual address space. Also we are going to use this xserver framebuffer mapping address for testing whether window backing pixmaps are allocated in the framebuffer and can be accelerated by G2D. Signed-off-by: Siarhei Siamashka <siarhei.siamashka@gmail.com>
-
- 13 Mar, 2013 3 commits
-
-
Siarhei Siamashka authored
Signed-off-by: Siarhei Siamashka <siarhei.siamashka@gmail.com>
-
Siarhei Siamashka authored
The existing kernel driver from Allwinner for G2D accelerator is quite bad because ioctls are synchronous and blocking the caller thread, compromise security (basically it is a backdoor for copying data in memory between any arbitrary physical addresses) and have high overhead (each individual fill or blit operation needs an ioctl). But we need to start with something, so use this stuff as a placeholder. The g2d_driver.h header file is taken from linux-sunxi-3.4 Signed-off-by: Siarhei Siamashka <siarhei.siamashka@gmail.com>
-
Siarhei Siamashka authored
It is basically the first test program for the sunxi disp ioctls wrapper code from "src/sunxi_disp.c". Signed-off-by: Siarhei Siamashka <siarhei.siamashka@gmail.com>
-
- 12 Mar, 2013 1 commit
-
-
Siarhei Siamashka authored
Signed-off-by: Siarhei Siamashka <siarhei.siamashka@gmail.com>
-
- 11 Mar, 2013 1 commit
-
-
Siarhei Siamashka authored
Signed-off-by: Siarhei Siamashka <siarhei.siamashka@gmail.com>
-
- 07 Mar, 2013 1 commit
-
-
http://linux-sunxi.orgSiarhei Siamashka authored
The installation instructions from http://linux-sunxi.org/Binary_drivers wiki page currently ask the users to run the following command after compiling and installing the ddx driver (either xf86-video-mali or xf86-video-sunxifb): cp xorg.conf /usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d/99-mali400.conf Regardless of whether it is a good idea to touch /usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d directory in the first place, providing a sample xorg.conf file may save some users from having unnecessary troubles. Reported-by: Michal Suchanek via https://github.com/ssvb/xf86-video-sunxifb/pull/1 Signed-off-by: Siarhei Siamashka <siarhei.siamashka@gmail.com>
-
- 23 Feb, 2013 1 commit
-
-
Siarhei Siamashka authored
Signed-off-by: Siarhei Siamashka <siarhei.siamashka@gmail.com>
-
- 18 Feb, 2013 2 commits
-
-
Siarhei Siamashka authored
Actually they are converted to 32x32 with 256 color palette. In the case if we have more than 256 unique colors, the color components of the pixels are reduced from 8-bit to 7-bit, then to 6-bit if necessary and so on (until we reduce the number of unique colors so that they can fit the palette). In the worst case we may theoretically end up with just 2 bits per A, R, G and B channels, but in practice 7 or 6 bits seem to be enough. Signed-off-by: Siarhei Siamashka <siarhei.siamashka@gmail.com>
-
Siarhei Siamashka authored
The modern desktops may use ARGB cursors. As the current sunxi display controller support code can't handle this type of cursor yet, the X server fallbacks to a software cursor which is not visible under layers and ruining user experience. This patch adds empty implementations for "UseHWCursorARGB" and "LoadCursorARGB" functions which just return error for now (so that the X server still fallbacks to software cursor). However we also introduce callback functions responsible for notifying the DRI2 code about enabling/disabling the use of hardware cursor. So that now hardware overlays are disabled when switching to software cursor and re-enabled again when switching back to hardware cursor. Signed-off-by: Siarhei Siamashka <siarhei.siamashka@gmail.com>
-
- 12 Feb, 2013 1 commit
-
-
Siarhei Siamashka authored
Testing with gnome-shell revealed a problem. We need to migrate pixmaps into UMP buffers in order to allow the GLESv2 based compositing manager to actually access the content of redirected windows, rendered by X11 applications into offscreen pixmaps. Just to make sure that we don't add any unneeded overhead for 2D (neither extra CPU cycles nor the increase for unrelated pixmaps memory footprint), a hash table (currently uthash [1]) is used for connecting DRI2-enabled pixmaps with UMP buffers. The lookups are only performed on DRI2 buffer creation and pixmap destruction. 1. http://troydhanson.github.com/uthash/ Reported-by: Michal Suchanek <hramrach@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Siarhei Siamashka <siarhei.siamashka@gmail.com>
-