1. 27 Jan, 2017 4 commits
  2. 26 Jan, 2017 1 commit
  3. 24 Jan, 2017 9 commits
  4. 23 Jan, 2017 9 commits
  5. 19 Jan, 2017 4 commits
  6. 18 Jan, 2017 7 commits
  7. 17 Jan, 2017 1 commit
    • David Cunado's avatar
      Correct system include order · 55c70cb7
      David Cunado authored
      NOTE - this is patch does not address all occurrences of system
      includes not being in alphabetical order, just this one case.
      
      Change-Id: I3cd23702d69b1f60a4a9dd7fd4ae27418f15b7a3
      55c70cb7
  8. 16 Jan, 2017 4 commits
  9. 14 Jan, 2017 1 commit
    • Masahiro Yamada's avatar
      fiptool: fix add_image() and add_image_desc() implementation · 11c0a4ff
      Masahiro Yamada authored
      The "make fip" shows the content of the generated FIP at the end of
      the build.  (This is shown by "fiptool info" command.)
      
      Prior to commit e0f083a0 ("fiptool: Prepare ground for expanding
      the set of images at runtime"), the last part of the build log of
       make CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-linux-gnu- BL33=../u-boot/u-boot.bin fip
      was like follows:
      
       Trusted Boot Firmware BL2: offset=0xB0, size=0x4188, cmdline="--tb-fw"
       EL3 Runtime Firmware BL31: offset=0x4238, size=0x6090, cmdline="--soc-fw"
       Non-Trusted Firmware BL33: offset=0xA2C8, size=0x58B51, cmdline="--nt-fw"
      
      With that commit, now it is displayed like follows:
      
       Non-Trusted Firmware BL33: offset=0xB0, size=0x58B51, cmdline="--nt-fw"
       EL3 Runtime Firmware BL31: offset=0x58C01, size=0x6090, cmdline="--soc-fw"
       Trusted Boot Firmware BL2: offset=0x5EC91, size=0x4188, cmdline="--tb-fw"
      
      You will notice two differences:
        - the contents are displayed in BL33, BL31, BL2 order
        - the offset values are wrong
      
      The latter is more serious, and means "fiptool info" is broken.
      
      Another interesting change is "fiptool update" every time reverses
      the image order.  For example, if you input FIP with BL2, BL31, BL33
      in this order, the command will pack BL33, BL31, BL2 into FIP, in
      this order.  Of course, the order of components is not a big deal
      except that users will have poor impression about this.
      
      The root cause is in the implementation of add_image(); the
      image_head points to the last added image.  For example, if you call
      add_image() for BL2, BL31, BL33 in this order, the resulted image
      chain is:
      
        image_head -> BL33 -> BL31 -> BL2
      
      Then, they are processed from the image_head in "for" loops:
      
        for (image = image_head; image != NULL; image = image->next) {
      
      This means images are handled in Last-In First-Out manner.
      
      Interestingly, "fiptool create" is still correct because
      add_image_desc() also reverses the descriptor order and the command
      works as before due to the double reverse.
      
      The implementation of add_image() is efficient, but it made the
      situation too complicated.
      
      Let's make image_head point to the first added image.  This will
      add_image() inefficient because every call of add_image() follows
      the ->next chain to get the tail.  We can solve it by adopting a
      nicer linked list structure, but I am not doing as far as that
      because we handle only limited number of images anyway.
      
      Do likewise for add_image_desc().
      
      Fixes: e0f083a0
      
       ("fiptool: Prepare ground for expanding the set of images at runtime")
      Signed-off-by: default avatarMasahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
      11c0a4ff